Description

Has anyone else experienced removal of serious comments from other ufo or uap subreddits? I had a comment removed from ufob because it “lacked quality of content “. My comment is below:

This is the skeleton of a young child that has been manipulated to construct a narrative about alien burials. This has been done in the past when people would modify corpses and skeletons for sideshow attractions. There was an entire industry behind this same type of thing. I’m familiar with this skeleton and the other cases that have been brought forward. I have a PhD in archaeology and anthropology. I have professional training in human osteology. I have worked in Bolivia and Peru on Tiwanaku and Inka period sites.
Once you become familiar with the details of the human skeleton, as I’ll outline for you here, I hope you’ll agree with me that this is an immoral, unethical, and downright disgusting treatment of human remains. This was someone’s child. Imagine someone going into a local cemetery and ripping a grave open and taking children out of their final resting place for selfish purposes. That is what this is. It is no different. I invite you to educate yourself and become familiar with the information I’m providing below as I interpret them only from the X-ray images. I understand if you disagree but I hope you can see that this is revolting and disgusting to perpetuate hoaxes like this. I’m happy to debate human evolutionary history with anyone after reading this about why an extraterrestrial species would not have these same characteristics.

The X-ray images depict the skeletal remains of a small individual, likely a child around 3-5 years old, based on the skeletal development that can be seen. The bones have been altered or positioned in such a way that the body is intended to resemble a fabricated “alien” form, which is obviously both scientifically and ethically problematic.
- The skull appears disproportionately large relative to the body, which might suggest either an intentional modification to fit a particular narrative or a condition like hydrocephalus. However, in the context of a child, the cranial sutures would still be widely open, as is likely the case here.
- The anterior fontanelle may still be slightly open or just beginning to close, consistent with the age range of 3-5 years.
- Although the teeth are not clearly visible in the X-ray, in a typical 3-5-year-old child, you would expect to see the primary (deciduous) teeth, particularly the central and lateral incisors, canines, and first molars.
- There are no visible permanent teeth, which would not yet have erupted at this age, though they may be present in the jaw as developing buds.
- The ribs show considerable cartilaginous content, indicating they have not yet begun to ossify fully, consistent with a child in the 3-5-year age range.
- The ribs and sternum also show incomplete fusion, typical of a young child whose bones are still growing and developing.
- The long bones visible in the X-rays, such as the humerus and radius, show completely unfused epiphyses, typical of a young child. This lack of fusion is a key indicator that these are the remains of a juvenile.
- The overall body proportions, with a large head and small body, are consistent with a child but may have been exaggerated or manipulated to fit an “alien” appearance. The abnormal positioning of the body in the middle image suggests postmortem alteration.

Why I think this is wrong on so many levels?
- The manipulation of a child’s skeletal remains to fabricate an alien body is a profound desecration of the deceased. Such actions disrespect the child’s remains and violate ethical standards in both anthropology and archaeology.
- Altering these remains to create a fraudulent artifact not only misleads the public but also harms the credibility of legitimate scientific research. It distorts our understanding of human history and perpetuates misinformation.
- The use of these remains to create a sensationalist artifact likely aims to generate attention, money, or notoriety. This exploitation is unethical, particularly when it involves the remains of a child.
- The remains are likely of Andean origin, a culture with deep and significant beliefs surrounding death and the treatment of the dead. Disregarding these beliefs for the sake of creating a hoax is an act of cultural violence and colonialism.
- Using human remains in this manner may violate local and international laws, particularly those protecting indigenous peoples and their heritage. There could be serious legal repercussions for those involved.

In summary, the use of a child’s skeletal remains in this manner is unethical and morally reprehensible. It disrespects the dead, distorts scientific knowledge, and exploits human remains for dubious purposes. Such actions should be condemned at the highest possible levels to protect the dignity of the deceased and the integrity of scientific research. Or next time it might be someone you know getting dug up, chopped up, and reassembled to create a new hoax.