Description

After part one of the AARO UAP Historical review part 1 came out months ago, I, like many of you was extremely disheartened by the official release and the blatent curated press around its release. I was very bothered by the refusal to address things as Non-human intelligence, forcing the extraterrestrial hypothesis as the only possible thing considered and then claiming no evidence of that. Also I was bothered by the multitudes of inaccuracies, the many cases completely ignored, the deductions made without showing evidence, etc.
As Kirkpatrick and many others have said, this was a part 1 that was released early. The full historical report was I believe due some time in June. This second part is supposed to cover the last year I believe and also I would imagine be a place to rebut or address a lot of the criticism of part 1. I’m very curious to see that… how is this second part handled after part 1 was shown to be done extremely poorly.

Doesn’t that mean they are late on delivering the full report by the congressionally mandated time? Has anyone else brought this up? Were they given an extension to deliver the rest of the report?

I know everyone will just exclaim it’s all crap, there’s nothing to glean from it, etc. I actually am looking to see how this second part is written after the way part one was handled under Kirkpatrick direct control, and how part 2 will be now that he’s not the director (although we know he’s still on their advisory board). When ever this does drop it will be a huge story here and we will take a lot of time reading through and dissecting what’s said. So has anyone heard about its arrival date/time? Isn’t it way past due now?

Thoughts.