Description
War.gov (http://War.gov) dropped PURSUE Release 04 today. We’ve finished downloading, indexing and processing the full tranche on Probed.
Disclosure: I run Probed. The original files remain linked throughout, and the goal here is to make the release searchable and easier to evaluate—not to replace the primary sources.
Release 04 contains:
* 14 documents
* 19 videos
* 4 NASA audio debriefings
* 3 NASA STS-80 images
* 40 records total
* 558 searchable document pages
* More than 5,500 caption segments from the NASA audio
A few of the most interesting items:
1. The 2015 Pantex incident
A newly released report describes an unidentified object entering the airspace around the Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas—the primary U.S. facility for assembling, disassembling and maintaining nuclear weapons.
According to the report, ground-surveillance radar tracked the object moving approximately 10–15 mph. Security officers estimated it was 100–200 feet above the ground and roughly four feet tall by two feet wide at the bottom.
The report says officers observed it through binoculars, could not identify a propulsion system and heard no sound. It also notes that the object did not approach sensitive assets or behave in a threatening manner.
2. A 1955 KC-97 radar and visual case
One USAF memorandum evaluates a KC-97 crew sighting near Newfoundland that coincided with ground-radar returns.
The committee wrote that it was “unable to explain the simultaneous ground radar returns and aircrew visual sightings.”
There is an important caveat: the committee tentatively accepted an explanation involving an electrical phenomenon combined with aircrew misinterpretation. Even so, it retained the case under the UFOB classification and recommended immediate fighter scrambles if similar incidents occurred again.
3. The 1949 Los Alamos green-fireball conference
This is a transcript of a conference involving scientists at Los Alamos, including Edward Teller and meteorics specialist Lincoln LaPaz.
LaPaz argued that the Starvation Peak green fireball he observed was not a conventional meteorite fall. He described its instant full intensity, yellow-green color, nearly horizontal trajectory and green fragmentation.
Later in the meeting, LaPaz told Teller:
The conference did not reach a consensus. Participants discussed meteoric, material-body, electron-phenomenon and chemical-light explanations.
4. Project Sign’s initial 1948 report
The release includes an early Project Sign progress report summarizing 100 UFO sightings.
Its tabulation records:
* 31 descriptions using oval, disc or saucer-shaped terminology
* 11 reports involving sound
* 23 reports involving exhaust trails
* Estimated speeds ranging from hovering or very slow movement to supersonic
* 77 reports involving a single object
These are historical witness and investigator estimates, not independently validated performance measurements. The underlying cases also varied considerably in quality.
5. Three NASA STS-80 photographs
Release 04 includes three photographs taken aboard Space Shuttle Columbia during STS-80 in 1996.
The images show an unidentified object near Earth’s limb across three frames. War.gov’s descriptions say it appears to rotate or tumble about its major axis and then continue along a trajectory between Columbia and Earth.
The photographs do not establish the object’s size, distance or physical characteristics, but having the three-image sequence available at full resolution is useful.
6. A Project Blue Book radar reality check
One of the more valuable sections comes from the 1966–67 review of Project Blue Book.
The committee discussed how pulses from one radar station could appear on another station’s display as a high-speed track or series of dots. It said this mutual-interference problem had “probably caused a number of UFO reports.”
The committee recommended radar-scope cameras to document unusual echoes and help distinguish interference from genuinely unidentified returns.
That kind of methodological discussion is important. The release contains unresolved cases, but it also documents how investigators identified possible conventional explanations and tried to improve future data collection.
7. NASA astronaut medical debriefings
The four long NASA audio files include Apollo 14 and Apollo 17 medical debriefings discussing astronauts’ reports of brief light flashes.
The astronauts describe sharp, instantaneous streaks and flashes apparently perceived inside the eye. In one Apollo 17 discussion, the crew reported an experimental blindfolded period without flashes, followed by the flashes returning later.
These recordings now have more than 5,500 searchable caption segments, so individual passages can be located without manually scrubbing through several hours of audio.
We ran the documents through page extraction and an OCR quality comparison. OCR replacements were only accepted when they improved the source text without discarding large portions of the existing extraction. For the videos, no usable spoken-caption tracks were available, so we indexed War.gov’s official timecoded descriptions rather than inventing transcripts.
The full Release 04 tracker is here:
https://probed.space/ufo-files (https://probed.space/ufo-files)
The source-grounded findings view is here:
https://probed.space/ufo-files/findings (https://probed.space/ufo-files/findings)
Official War.gov (http://War.gov) release page:
https://www.war.gov/UFO/ (https://www.war.gov/UFO/)
If people want, I can also do a follow-up focused on one category—the Pantex report, historical Air Force documents, NASA material or the 19 new videos—and pull together the most relevant pages and timecodes.
Comments 0
Sign in to join the discussion.
What do you think it is?
Sign in to vote. 0 votes.
👥 Other witnesses
🙋 I saw this tooSaw it too? Add your account — independent witnesses are the best evidence.
🔔 Alerts for sightings like this
🌤️ Sky conditions weather, moon, planets, satellites, aircraft & launches at that time
Source
u/ProbedSpace on r/UFOs
Citations
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1ut1lf2/wargov_pursue_release_…
No comments yet. Start the conversation.