Open on Reddit ↗ 💾 Saved copy
Show the original Reddit post

Description

Hey guys, I'm running on fumes, but I wanted to get this pushed up and available for people to start looking at before I get some sleep.

So much of the analysis of the mh370 has been built around informal process.

However when analyzing video, there are a lot of factors that will change the video you see.
There is a lot more work to do, but you should be able to access the repository here:

forensic_video (https://github.com/nyxwulf/forensic_video)

I took the video from this discussion earlier: Thermal video is 24 fps (https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15upea2/the_mh370_thermal_vide…)

In this case, I took the video from that url, and downloaded it using to separate encoders (h264, and then h265_lossless).

You should be able to clone the repo, and see the exact files I downloaded.

The difference is start, yet both of these were taken from the web archive url.

The h264 version is 26 MB

While h265_lossless is 159 MB

If you are loading it into Adobe Premiere, or After Effects, the browser or a host of other things, you are almost certainly getting a down sampled lossy encoded version.

I would like to build up methods for us to start from the same place with our analysis, and make we are working with a replicable process.

All my notes are in the README.org (https://README.org) files. I'm sure it's mess, but I'll clean that up after some sleep.

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

What do you think it is?

Sign in to vote. 0 votes.

👥 Other witnesses

🙋 I saw this too

Saw it too? Add your account — independent witnesses are the best evidence.

🔔 Alerts for sightings like this

Source

u/nyxwulf on r/UFOs

Citations

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15v5gcn/forensic_video_public_…

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites