Open on Image ↗ 💾 Saved copy
Open on Reddit ↗ 💾 Saved copy
Show the original Reddit post

Description

I very much understand why this community is no fan of a certain well-known debunker who seems to have trouble to get his point across without sounding very condescending.But I do think he and \\@realityseaker on twitter might really have a point here.

The video is stabilized and the counter argument against the original stabilized video is that the plane is also shaking and since the contrails are behind that would explain the difference between the two.

Here I hope to show that in some frames the positions of the beginning of the contrail and the plane really do differ a lot. I think it really looks like that for 2 of these frames the port-side contrail is not originating from the engine.

I think there is at least one other moment where this occurs in the stabilized video, but I hope this keep this image can keep the argument alive, at least for now.

No comments yet. Start the conversation.

What do you think it is?

Sign in to vote. 0 votes.

👥 Other witnesses

🙋 I saw this too

Saw it too? Add your account — independent witnesses are the best evidence.

🔔 Alerts for sightings like this

Source

u/just_curio_us on r/UFOs

Citations

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/15uzjv0/the_plane_composed_upo…

GalleryBrowseFeedBoardsStatsFavorites Guides What’s that light?Starlink in the skyUAP explainedUFO newsUFO videos & documentariesArea 51Skinwalker RanchOfficial UFO files