Description

I was rewatching the Grusch interview and they had this note during it, the drawings were obscured during the original airing and I had some thoughts.

I had listened to an interview with researcher Kevin Randle who was skeptical of Grusch, one of his primary reasons being that this Italy crash in 1933 had been thoroughly debunked. I have followed the crash a little bit, but had never seen this particular drawing and note before, the note I had seen was a telegram that recommended setting up a group to manage the UFO crash, and experts of the correspondence at the time had been suspect that it was authentic, it was supposedly somewhat reminiscent of the formatting and paper stock used at the time, but had some esoteric aspects that were out of line so they were thought to be forgerys/hoax material.

But I would like to discuss the drawings as well. It would seem the larger cylinder craft looks to be very close to what we would recognize as human craft. The engine in particular looks extremely familiar of decades and decades of a standard rocket engine. It occurred to me that perhaps that wasn't the case until this craft had been recovered. The windows are very interesting, who would go sight seeing in a rocket. More on this later. The nose being flat would seem to be quite a bit silly as well, i would think not very aerodynamic, though it does remind me of some bullets so maybe I am just unfamiliar with the purpose of a flat cone?

The saucers seem to be one intact and one damaged. That or the picture is of the guys egg breakfast that morning.

Anyways, what occurs to me is this: Is it possible we do live along side some sort of terrestrial species, and they are extremely competent in some ways, say refinement or efficiency, but they lack any inventiveness or creativity. Maybe they are ocean based and have far less experience with out of water technology.

Maybe they monitor us, maybe can do so perfectly cloaked in a different dimension and have access to whatever they want to view from us. Maybe they take the things that we invent, say rocketry or any other advancement and get to work on making them better. Maybe they'd never considered any of the principles of technology that come so naturally to us, maybe that's why their craft seem to match or just barely outpace our own until fairly recently. Maybe we come up with the ideas and then they run with them in a far more effective way.

Otherwise, assuming the Italy crash is legit, why would their ships look so rudimentary? Why would they be reminiscent of the craft we would ourselves be constructing at the time? Think of the ghost rockets in Scandinavia, maybe these were their testing grounds after they saw the rockets we were inventing? If not did this note describe the flying saucers that would be supposedly seen all over the world, except a decade before the term was coined?

Also I was wondering if someone that knows Italian can translate the note. I know the handwriting is difficult to read, a weird move if it were indeed a hoax as it's pretty ineffective, but I think with a fluent Italian and a keen eye it should be able to be deciphered ok.

Thanks!