More media 3
Description
I posted a substantive report that was getting lots of positive traction and released net new information and the mods took it down? What in the world? That was a lot of hard work 😮💨
Comments 0
Sign in to join the discussion.
What do you think it is?
Sign in to vote. 0 votes.
👥 Other witnesses
🙋 I saw this tooSaw it too? Add your account — independent witnesses are the best evidence.
🔔 Alerts for sightings like this
Source
u/ahellman on r/UFOs
Citations
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1r5j9w7/why_was_my_post_taken_…
Similar sightings described alike
Planetary consciousness, UFO’s, Artificial Intelligence and the „Abyss from there is no return“
Do Historical “Sky Battles” Resemble Modern UAP Reports? A Source-Critical Study of Nuremberg 1561, Basel 1566, Stralsund 1665, and the PURSUE FilesNuremberg
Emotion and Sentiment Analysis of 288K UFO Sighting Reports: Report Language Is Twice as Likely to Be Positive Over Negative, and Emotions Like Curiosity and Awe Outweigh Fear2026
Recently posted "proof" of MJ-12 docs is actually disproof - new analysis2026
I've decided to open source my research into vacuum balloons and a potentially new approach to nano foams. This information is very interesting when compared to the UFO metal sphere analysis…
"2027": Is there reasoning for the "2027" date being relevant to disclosure based strictly upon U.S. classification laws? (tl;dr: yes, potentially)2024
New evidence against legitimacy of questioned MJ-12 UFO docs - incorrect stamp used, further anachronisms, and more duplicated control numbers
Take a Refreshing Dive into The Electromagnetic Rabbit HoleCanada
No comments yet. Start the conversation.