Description

In a sharp exchange during the Disclosure Day Panel (https://www.youtube.com/live/zmlvM1gQUVo?si=pIwwMqw88kv37ZN0), Danny Sheehan pressed former staffer Kirk McConnell on what the Senate has learned from first hand witnesses.

According to McConnell, they know about species, the physics and that there have been multiple crash retrievals.

LAWYER OF WHISTLEBLOWERS SAYS WHAT THE SENATE KNOWS ABOUT UFO PROGRAM

In an interview (https://www.youtube.com/live/drMTwFriaDA?si=iYuS8Qrs-bTIRNBB) with New Thinking Allowed this year Sheehan went even further. He was asked about what the Senate knows from the perspective of a lawyer who's firm is representing whistleblowers and helping draft legislation. Sheehan said its been confirmed to them the Roswell crash is real, the debris was brought to Wright Patterson. Someone has given them the current location of a craft. Sheehan said they know live beings have been captured at one point.

NSF PROGRAM DIRECTOR CONFIRMS SHE ATTENDED 100+ OFFICIAL UFO MEETINGS AT NSF

Additionally during the livestream Anna Brady Estevez, the former Program Director for the National Science foundations Space and Energy portfolios, admitted to sitting in on well over 100 meetings related to UFOs in her official work. It was also in that role she funded a scientist named Richard Banduric who allegedly worked on a crash retrieval team. Banduric has been working on a project funded by DARPA and the NSF to create interplanetary craft that use UFO related field propulsion.

Is there even a coherent counter argument to explain why all these people, are lying or incredibly mistaken? Because the only other option, the core allegations are true. In any other circumstance, if all these credible professionals made such definitive and corroborating statements about their work it would be taken extremely serious, while of course requiring further verification.

I appreciate Kirk McConnell saying what he has publicly, but I wish he was more honest about where a lot of the blame lies for the current inaction. He's worked for senate committees for 30 years. He knows the staffers and politicians. Naturally you'd expect he would give them benefit of the doubt. But let's be real, at this point they are part of the cover up. I covered this months ago in a substack article (https://open.substack.com/pub/unapologetic/p/can-cowardly-senate-inte…).

THE SENATE HAS ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO FORCE DSICLOSURE

Witnesses like Grusch, Barber, Mathew Brown and apparantly 30 others have given explosive testimony and evidence to the senate for years. But all we have to show for it is 60 pages of legislation that none of the authors will break a sweat to actually pass it for 3 years straight? Something doesn't smell right.

You have Gilibrand doing fundraiser attended by all the Defense contractors in question and seems to be the last person in the room to think AAROs running a legit operation. Rubio might literally be running the program since becoming National Security Advisor while also the Secretary of State. And Chuck Schumer who wants to act like he had no leverage to force the House to vote on his UAPDA bill while he was in charge of the entire Sentate. These are the serious Senators on the UFO topic.

They all are playing ignorant and setting up all these imaginary roadblocks to avoid responsibility for dealing with this mess of a constitutional crisis. Any member of the Senate can go on the floor and read the testimony from whistleblowers into the congressional record, regardless if it's classified. Mike Gravel did it with the Pentagon Papers. They are immune from prosecution.

Additionally the chair of the Intel Committee can personally choose to make the testimony of whistleblowers who've gone to the committee for years available to the public as part of their oversight authority. They choose not to. When Kirk and others say they need more first hand witnesses to take action, that's a lie or a cop out. What's the magic number that will make the senate start issue subpoenas and sending referrals for criminal investigations to the DoJ? My guess is there is none. Just like how we have to jump through all these flaming hoops to get the UAPDA passed. Or how AARO needs more sensors. There's always some 100% necessary bureaucratic process to go through before someone else can admit theres been a lot of lyin going on around here for 80 years.

1979 NASA report (https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19800010907/downloads/19800010907…) on UFOs and Field Propulsion

Podcast (https://spotify.link/1aK6KBY0DXb) with Anna Brady Estevez, Hal Puthoff, Richard Banduric and others