๐Ÿ“„ Report๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ United States

NASA UAP Independent Study Team report (2023)

๐Ÿ›๏ธ NASA

A 16-member outside panel, chaired by astrophysicist David Spergel, looked at how NASA could use science to study UAPs.

Key points

  • It found no evidence that UAPs have an extraterrestrial origin, while saying it could not rule things out.
  • It said the biggest problem is poor data: most sightings come from instruments not built to study them.
  • It recommended crowdsourced reports, better calibrated sensors and artificial intelligence to sort data.
  • NASA named a Director of UAP Research the same day.

Why it matters

It is the main civilian science agencyโ€™s view on how UAPs should be studied.

Read it yourself

The summary above is ours, written in plain English. Always check the original: the official files on this page go straight to the source, and each one has a backup copy saved by the Internet Archive in case the government page moves.

Cite this recordNASA. (2023). NASA UAP Independent Study Team report (2023). https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf

Related records

๐Ÿ“„ Report๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

255 413270 UFO's and Defense What Should we Prepare For

NASA

This file contains an independent report on UFOs written by the French association COMETA (previously published in the French magazine VDS in 1999), which details the results of a study by the Institute of Higher Studies for National Defence. The file also includes a letter from Carol Rosin in which she notes that she was spokesperson for von Braun during the last years of his life.

On ufos.dev

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonightโ€™s SkyStatsFavorites