Show the original X / Twitter post
More media 1
Description
As a reminder, debunkers are not legal experts. There are numerous angles for why David Grusch was resistant to meeting with Kirkpatrick and AARO, and the seemingly least-likely one would be for dishonest reasons. As described above, concerns around the influence of the CIA are documented and valid, whether the Black Vault agrees or not.
Comments 0
Sign in to join the discussion.
What do you think it is?
Sign in to vote. 0 votes.
👥 Other witnesses
🙋 I saw this tooSaw it too? Add your account — independent witnesses are the best evidence.
🔔 Alerts for sightings like this
Source
u/Tailed_Whip_Scorpion on r/UFOs
Citations
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1cku3u3/the_real_reason_david_…
https://twitter.com/matthew_pines/status/1786882965374468114
Similar sightings described alike
Recently posted "proof" of MJ-12 docs is actually disproof - new analysis2026
The JFK files: CIA Director Allen Dulles' calendar entries line up EXACTLY with the memo from President Kennedy to Dulles demanding to know about MJ-12 Intelligence Operations. There are also…
"2027": Is there reasoning for the "2027" date being relevant to disclosure based strictly upon U.S. classification laws? (tl;dr: yes, potentially)2024
AARO Senate Hearing - a detailed overview of the hearing and criticisms2024
CIA Director Allen Dulles to President John F. Kennedy: “Sorry, you don’t have a Need To Know about UFOs”. He is forced to resign 15 days later – but did he exact deadly revenge almost two years to…Roswell
Do Historical “Sky Battles” Resemble Modern UAP Reports? A Source-Critical Study of Nuremberg 1561, Basel 1566, Stralsund 1665, and the PURSUE FilesNuremberg
Planetary consciousness, UFO’s, Artificial Intelligence and the „Abyss from there is no return“
MH370 Airliner videos part III: The rabbit hole goes deeper than we thought2014
No comments yet. Start the conversation.