Description

In this interview I watched on Event Horizon with him he talked about how Galileo was persecuted for his ideas, and then literally persecutes the idea that there could be more to physics than what we already know. He spoke as if humans already know everything about physics, saying that under no circumstances ever would an object be able to move as quickly as UAP are supposed to move without producing a fireball due to friction with the atmosphere. John (the interviewer) seemed uncomfortable that Avi kept trying to say that there was no way there could NOT be a fireball, to the point where John says "But if there were some new physics or perhaps some transdimensional travel.." then Avi again discounts the idea that we could have missed anything in physics, and then says that if they were trans-dimensional we wouldn't see them as they go from point a to point b, but THEN says that the Nimitz was probably just two different objects, even though he has just described what it would look like if an object used manifold space to move, i.e. you would see it at one point, and then it would suddenly be 60 miles away next to the Princeton.. I dunno. I initially was super invested and happy with Avi, but he seems to be saying one thing about keeping an open scientific mind out of one side of his mouth, while at the same time saying that it's ridiculous to have an open mind about these objects violating known physics. What do you guys think?