Description

https://preview.redd.it/buejiwxfmx881.jpg?width=1440&format=pjpg&auto…

Lue Elizondo's Unidentified: UFOs in the Headlines (https://www.history.com/specials/unidentified-ufos-in-the-headlines) is an excellent follow-up to The Phenomenon (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onEXmLX2ZZQ). In about an 1 hour and 22 mins, Lue Elizondo and team attempt to touch on key points from the Pentagon's unclassified preliminary assessment (https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/Prelimary-Assess…) on UAP. In order to further propel their claim:

"UAP are real and they are of Unknown Origin."

For instance, since they cannot provide the classified evidence of the (143) unidentified cases. What they do instead is, that they show you some key reports from retired USA military personnel. Retired military personnel who have allegedly witnessed some weird shit in the skies, which compelled them to come forward and tell their story to Lue on his show "Unidentified." To illustrate what perhaps some of the (143) unidentified cases may look like, to give you a sense of how bizarre and outlandish these claims are. They show some recreations based on eye-witness accounts. It is not much, but it is something very compelling. (For Example: Omar Lara's testimony (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCFXxN_Zpg4)).

Another key-point which they later bring up is the whole 'Mirage Men (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srtrRbt77AE)' angle. Where a former CIA agent, Richard C. Doty reveals how he deliberately injected misinformation into the UFO community via the media, or misinformation fed to UFOlogists. All this, in order to muddy the waters of the world of UFO sightings. The implication is, for instance, that the stories you hear on tabloids or the fantastic shit which you sometimes hear UFO researchers say, it may very well be some form of misinformation. However, Rick highlights that NOT all of it is misinformation.

"There is probably about 80% of false information being presented, about 20% factual information, unfortunately the UFO Community doesn't know which is which." —Richard C. Doty

Rick says that about 20% out the 100% of the information "put out there" on UFOs is true and that the other 80% is bullshit. However, 20% out of the information, being true, is still a significant percentage. This creates a problem for UFOlogists. How do they know what may be true and what is misinformation? Furthermore, how do they know what they believe NOT to be bullshit, How do they know is good information? How do they sort the "bullshit" out from "what may be credible"?

Well, Lue Elizondo has highlighted a very good tool to use for discerning the truth from the bullshit. This tool is called the (5) observables (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sstBSuXIW0I) - For reference:

1. Positive Lift or Anti-Gravity: The ability to fly without apparent means of propulsion or lift.
2. Instantaneous Acceleration: The ability for a craft to reach a high rate of speed in a short amount of time.
3. Hypersonic Velocities: A craft's Ability to reach speeds of 3,700 miles per hour (5x the Speed of Sound). Without emitting a "sonic boom."
4. Low-Observability: A craft's ability to conceal itself from any kind of radar.
5. Trans-medium Travel: A craft's ability to move seamlessly through space, air and water.

Why is this tool important? Well, because Lue Elizondo himself, used it to help determine what may be properly classified as UAP. Not all of these observables have to be present. But the descriptions which lead to the presence of any of these observables, is used to categorize something which may probably NOT be bullshit. Particularly, something observed by military personnel. Which is what limitation, Lue Elizondo had while working on AATIP. The program wasn't set-up to gather sightings from the public masses. It was set-up to gather sightings within the military. For instance, the USA Navy.

Let's say that you dismiss all of the sightings from the past 70+ years and call them all bullshit. Because you don't want to dig up and figure out what "may be true." Let's say that you, however, believe that the videos authenticated by the Pentagon (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rO_M0hLlJ-Q). Let's say that those are of real UAP. Let's entertain that thought.

So, this brings up a very good point. This documentary's target audience is a very particular viewer: The "Skeptical" Believer who is most skeptical about UAP being of "Unknown Origin." Someone "who believes" that the answer to the UAP Mystery is: "The Phenomenon is nothing but man-made technology and furthermore it is American made."

What Lue and team present you in about 1 hour or so. All of it, leads to this point. It's almost like a very good mind-fuck. Because this documentary requires the viewer to accept that the (5) observables are based on something which is in fact, "real." In other words, you cannot get into this debate without admitting or accepting that UAP are real. Period.

Now, what is the origin of UAP? IF they are, in fact, manmade secret tech? Are they Chinese or Russian? The documentary presents the viewer with reasons WHY Lue and team, based on their expertise, as well as observations by experts which they have consulted with. That they do not believe it to be so. They DO NOT believe that America's "adversaries" have somehow leapfrogged and acquired incredibly advanced technology which would account for objects over the skies, underwater and in space capable of demonstrating all (5) observables. Let alone some of them. Because in essence, the (5) Observables are nothing short of extraordinary.

One point which they use here, is that currently the US military is in possession of the most advanced manmade military tech on the face of the planet. So then, for anyone who claims that this is, in-fact manmade technology and furthermore that it is American. Then they fall into a slippery slope. In other words, Lue Elizondo is saying "To push the idea that this advanced tech is manmade is a more extraordinary claim than to say that this advanced tech is of unknown origin."

The slippery slope is as follows: "IF this is "secret" US tech. Then the USA has had it and it has been developing and actively testing it for over 70+ years now." WHY? Well, because you can actually go back and find some of the (5) observables present throughout several of the eye-witness accounts from decades ago all the way to most recently. They are there in the sightings. Not only in the USA, but all over the world.

Fact: The UAP is a Global Phenomenon. Period.

So, you are also saying that: "The USA has tested this advanced tech all over the world. Including over the skies of its allies and adversaries." Well, even if you believe that all the reports from 70+ years in our collective history are bullshit. You still cannot deny the fact, that some of the (5) observables are present on some of those reports. So at least those should have some credence in your eyes. If this is so, and this tech is manmade, then why not use this tech for tactical advantage? Why even keep it "hidden?" And while we are at it. Know this: Are you sure that they have done a good job at keeping it "hidden"? When these things are known to light up like a Xmas Tree whether in the daylight on at nighttime or over the sea or in space? Do you realize that owning this technology would allow anyone on this planet to "get in, do their bidding and get out" without the fear of being caught? Do you seriously think that any nation would keep such technology in their arsenal, and NOT use it, at all to their advantage? Do you really think that the USA would do that? Furthermore, UAP are capable of shutting down nukes. Who would hold back on using such tech against their adversaries?"

And if you do believe this slippery slope to be true. Then Lue Elizondo is placing the spin-foil hat over your head.