Contractor guard breakdown claim (1974)

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 3
This article is incomplete. Few or no reliable sources about it have been found yet, so it only gives a short summary and its connections to other articles. You can help by suggesting an edit with a source. See all incomplete articles.
Contractor guard breakdown claim (1974)
Illustration of a military base at night
Illustration: a military base at night. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
DateApril 1974
TopicsBeings & bodies (topic), Government programs (topic)
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 79
Year1974 in UFO history
Timeline1974 on the UAP Timeline
Sources1

Contractor guard breakdown claim (1974) — A defense contractor employee claims a guard broke down after seeing a non-human being.

According to the testimony, an employee of a defence contractor said that in April 1974 a security guard at a facility broke down after seeing a non-human being. The account is sourced to an article on the Mysterious Universe website titled "An Extraterrestrial 007?", which is behind a paywall.

We haven't been able to find the original account, the names of the employee, guard or facility, or any supporting records. It should be treated as an unverified second-hand story, part of a broader category of claims from defence-industry workers about encounters inside secure facilities.

People and topics

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

On the Timeline

Illustration of glowing orbs in the sky
Illustration: glowing orbs in the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1974 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

  1. mysteriousuniverse.org · mysteriousuniverse.org · archived copy

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites