John Brandenburg's theories

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
John Brandenburg's theories
SOLAR ENGINEER WORKS ON ONE OF SEVERAL PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS BEING EVALUATED FOR INDUSTRY PARTNERS AT SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES IN THE U.S…
SOLAR ENGINEER WORKS ON ONE OF SEVERAL PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS BEING EVALUATED FOR INDUSTRY PARTNERS AT SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES IN THE U.S… Photo: U.S. Department of Energy · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
Date1994
TopicsGovernment programs (topic)
PeopleJohn Brandenburg
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 120
Year1994 in UFO history
Timeline1994 on the UAP Timeline
Sources4

John Brandenburg is an American plasma physicist with a career in defence and space research who has made a series of controversial claims, including that an image from the 1994 Clementine lunar mission showed an artificial structure and that ancient civilisations on Mars were destroyed by nuclear explosions.[1][2][3]

Career

Illustration of Earth, the Moon and space
Illustration: Earth, the Moon and space. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Brandenburg earned his doctorate at the University of California, Davis, and has worked at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and as a senior propulsion scientist at Orbital Technologies Corporation in Madison, Wisconsin. He was involved in Clementine, a joint Defense Department and NASA mission that mapped the Moon in 1994 and found evidence suggesting water ice at the lunar poles. He has also developed unconventional theories linking gravity and electromagnetism.[1][2]

The Clementine claim

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In interviews Brandenburg has said that while working on Clementine he saw an image of a mile-wide rectilinear structure that looked "unmistakably artificial", that it caused him "great concern" as someone in the space-defence community, and that he was told not to interfere with a highly cleared team that analysed the images. Mainstream analyses of Clementine and later, higher-resolution lunar images have found no artificial structures.[2][4]

Mars

Jill M. Hruby
Jill M. Hruby Photo: United States Department of Energy · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

In 2011 Brandenburg proposed that a natural nuclear reaction about 180 million years ago had devastated the Mare Acidalium region of Mars, citing gamma-ray maps and spikes of xenon-129 in the Martian atmosphere; NASA geologist David Beaty and Lawrence Livermore's Lars Borg were sceptical. By 2014 he argued that two ancient humanoid civilisations, at Cydonia and Utopia, had been wiped out by nuclear airbursts launched by another alien race, presenting the idea at an American Physical Society meeting and in his books on Mars. The work was not peer reviewed, and no prominent scientists have endorsed it.[1][3]

Significance

Illustration of a disc-shaped craft in the night sky
Illustration: a disc-shaped craft in the night sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The testimony includes Brandenburg as an example of people with genuine space-programme credentials who have publicly argued for evidence of extraterrestrial activity.[1][3]

People and topics

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • John Brandenburg — Plasma physicist who made claims about Mars and the Moon.
  • NASA — The U.S. civilian space agency, created in 1958.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1994 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites