The Age of Disclosure

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🎬 Book or film

Contents 4
The Age of Disclosure
Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
TypeBook, film or media
Also known asAge of Disclosure

The Age of Disclosure is a 2025 American documentary film, the directorial debut of producer Dan Farah, in which former U.S. government, military and intelligence officials allege that the government has hidden evidence of non-human intelligence for decades.[1]

Content

Luis Elizondo in San Marino, interviewed by Max Moszkowicz.
Luis Elizondo in San Marino, interviewed by Max Moszkowicz. Photo: Author: Max Moszkowicz Video title: Lue Elizondo - Max Moszkowicz San Marino interview… · CC BY 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

The film is narrated by Luis Elizondo and features dozens of interviewees; The Hollywood Reporter counted 34. They include former official Christopher Mellon, members of Congress such as Tim Burchett and Anna Paulina Luna, and Marco Rubio, now Secretary of State. Its central claim is that intelligent non-human life is present on Earth and that the U.S. government has hidden this, including recovering non-human technology since 1947.[1][2][3]

Release

George Simion with Anna Paulina Luna in Washington D.C., 6 June 2025
George Simion with Anna Paulina Luna in Washington D.C., 6 June 2025 Photo: AUR Alianța pentru Unirea Românilor · CC0 · via Wikimedia Commons

The film premiered at the South by Southwest festival on 9 March 2025. It was released on Amazon Prime Video on 21 November 2025, with a limited theatrical release in New York, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Deadline reported the producers' claim that within 48 hours it had become Prime Video's highest-grossing documentary, ahead of Free Solo; the claim was not independently verified.[1]

Reception

Illustration of a screen showing a flying saucer
Illustration: a screen showing a flying saucer. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Critics were mostly negative: in late November 2025 the film had a 27 per cent approval rating from 11 critics on Rotten Tomatoes and a Metacritic score of 45, while the audience score was much higher. Reviewers criticised the lack of physical evidence and the reliance on eyewitness testimony; critic Daniel Fienberg noted that since nothing is proven, nothing can be refuted.[1]

References

This page was last edited on 31 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites