Tremonton film

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🛸 Case

Contents 5
Tremonton film
Illustration of a screen showing a flying saucer
Illustration: a screen showing a flying saucer. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
TypeCase

The Tremonton film is a short colour film of a group of bright objects shot on 2 July 1952 near Tremonton, Utah, by U.S. Navy photographer Delbert C. Newhouse. It was studied by Air Force and Navy analysts, who could not identify the objects, and by the CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel, which concluded in January 1953 that they were probably birds such as seagulls.[1][2]

The sighting

Advertisement for Gray Barker's book They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers formatted similar to a newspaper article and ran in a 1956 issue of The…
Advertisement for Gray Barker's book They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers formatted similar to a newspaper article and ran in a 1956 issue of The… Photo: University Books · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Newhouse was a Navy warrant officer and experienced chief photographer. Around 11 a.m. on 2 July 1952 he was driving with his wife and two children on a highway a few miles from Tremonton when his wife noticed a group of bright objects in the clear sky. Newhouse stopped, took his 16 mm Bell and Howell camera with a telephoto lens from the car boot, and filmed about ten to twelve objects moving westward in rough formation, one of which broke away in the opposite direction. He later said the objects looked like two saucers, one upside down on top of the other, and that they had been closer before he got the camera out.[1]

Analyses

The 445th Airlift Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio received its first C-17 Globemaster III Jan. 21,2010. The aircraft is on loan from…
The 445th Airlift Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio received its first C-17 Globemaster III Jan. 21,2010. The aircraft is on loan from… Photo: United States Air Force · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

The film went to the Air Force's Project Blue Book. Analysts at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base concluded that the objects were not balloons or aircraft and were unlikely to be birds. The Navy Photographic Interpretation Laboratory at Anacostia then made a detailed frame-by-frame study, reportedly involving about 1,000 man-hours, plotting the motion and brightness of the objects; it found no sign of flapping and suggested that the objects were self-luminous and not birds, balloons or aircraft.[1]

Robertson Panel

Howard P. Robertson: Luis W. Alvarez
Howard P. Robertson: Luis W. Alvarez Photo: Donald Cooksey / Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (per [3] · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

In January 1953 the panel of scientists convened for the CIA under physicist H. P. Robertson viewed the film. Astronomer Thornton Page said the objects resembled seagulls he had seen soaring in bright sunlight, and the panel concluded that they were probably birds; it also criticised the Navy's light-measurement method. UFO researchers have disputed the bird explanation, pointing to Newhouse's description and the earlier analyses.[1][2]

Later reviews

Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The film was reviewed again as case 49 of the Condon Committee report (1968), which also favoured birds. Robert M. L. Baker Jr., who examined it in 1955 and testified to Congress in 1968, found the motion unlike soaring birds but reached no definite conclusion. Newhouse said parts of the original film were missing from the copy returned to him. In September 2026 the film was included in the U.S. government's release of UFO files.[1][3]

References

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites