1959 in UFO history

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 📅 Year

Contents 5
1959 in UFO history
Carl Jung, whose 1959 book treated flying saucers as a modern myth
Carl Jung, whose 1959 book treated flying saucers as a modern myth Photo: Prints & Photographs Division Library of Congress · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
Year1959
Events1
Decade1950s
TopicsBeings & bodies (topic), Bases & Area 51 (topic)
Timeline1959 on the UAP Timeline

1959 in UFO history — the UAP Timeline records 1 event in 1959, mostly about beings & bodies and bases & area 51. People named in these events include Leonard Stringfield, J. Allen Hynek.

Overview

The best-remembered UFO publication of 1959 was by the Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology. His Flying Saucers: A Modern Myth of Things Seen in the Sky treated the subject as a cultural phenomenon.[1] Jung said he was "puzzled to death" by flying saucers. He likened them to a "technological angel" and noted that their round, mandala-like shape seemed to act on the psyche as a "symbol of wholeness" in times of confusion.[2] His approach later influenced Jacques Vallée, whose sense of the phenomenon was, in Wired's phrase, "Jung-accented."[2] See also the psychosocial hypothesis.

The timeline's only 1959 entry is an anonymous claim recorded by researcher Leonard Stringfield. A French scientist, "Mr. L," said he had been asked to work at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base for three months in 1959. He claimed he studied the cellular structure of two tall, deceased humanoid bodies stored there, with long blond hair and light blue eyes, and was sworn to secrecy for ten years.[3] The claim has not been verified. See French scientist Mr. L at Wright-Patterson.

Events

People

Nearby years

1958 in UFO history · 1960 in UFO history

References

Facts in this article are drawn in part from the Wikipedia article “Unidentified flying object”, available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 licence.

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites