Battle of Los Angeles

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🛸 Case

Contents 5
Battle of Los Angeles
Page B of the February 26, 1942, Los Angeles Times, showing the coverage of the so-called Battle of Los Angeles and its aftermath (lots of articles…
Page B of the February 26, 1942, Los Angeles Times, showing the coverage of the so-called Battle of Los Angeles and its aftermath (lots of articles… Photo: LA Times. · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
TypeCase
Also known asGreat Los Angeles Air Raid

The Battle of Los Angeles, also called the Great Los Angeles Air Raid, was a false alarm on the night of 24–25 February 1942, less than three months after Pearl Harbor, when U.S. Army anti-aircraft batteries fired more than 1,400 shells into the sky over Los Angeles at reported enemy aircraft that were never found. A retouched newspaper photograph of searchlights converging on the scene later became a popular image in UFO lore.[1][2]

Background

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The United States had entered World War II in December 1941, and fears of a Japanese attack on the West Coast were high. On 23 February 1942 the Japanese submarine I-17 shelled the Ellwood oil field near Santa Barbara, causing little damage but great alarm. The Office of Naval Intelligence warned that an attack on mainland California could come within hours.[1][3]

The night of 24–25 February

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

An alert was called at 7:18 p.m. on 24 February and lifted at 10:23 p.m. At 2:25 a.m. on 25 February air raid sirens sounded across Los Angeles County and a total blackout was ordered. From 3:16 a.m. the 37th Coast Artillery Brigade opened fire with machine guns and anti-aircraft guns at reported targets; more than 1,400 rounds were fired before the guns fell silent at about 4:14 a.m., and the all-clear sounded at 7:21 a.m. No bombs fell and no aircraft were shot down, but falling shell fragments damaged buildings and vehicles, and five civilians died indirectly, three in car accidents and two of heart attacks.[1][4]

Official explanations

Illustration of a disc-shaped craft in the night sky
Illustration: a disc-shaped craft in the night sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox told reporters the incident was a false alarm caused by anxiety and "war nerves". The Army, reflecting the view of Chief of Staff Gen. George Marshall, suggested that enemy agents might have used commercial aircraft to provoke panic. Some newspapers suspected a cover-up, and a congressman called for an investigation. After the war Japan stated that it had sent no aircraft over Los Angeles.[1][3]

A 1949 account by the Coast Artillery Association said a meteorological balloon had "started all the shooting", and in 1983 the Office of Air Force History concluded that weather balloons released that night set off the alarm and that searchlit shell bursts were then mistaken for enemy planes.[1][2]

The photograph and UFO interpretations

Illustration of a photograph of an unknown object
Illustration: a photograph of an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

On 26 February 1942 the Los Angeles Times published a photograph of searchlight beams converging on a bright spot in the sky. Decades later, UFO writers presented it as showing a large craft caught in the beams, but the image had been heavily retouched with paint before publication, a common newspaper practice of the time, which created the appearance of a solid object.[1][5] The event inspired Steven Spielberg's 1979 comedy 1941.[1]

References

This page was last edited on 31 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites