Mariana UFO film

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🛸 Case

Contents 5
Mariana UFO film
Illustration of a screen showing a flying saucer
Illustration: a screen showing a flying saucer. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
TypeCase
Also known asMariana film, Montana movie, Nick Mariana

The Mariana UFO film, also called the Montana movie, is a 16-millimetre colour film shot on 15 August 1950 by Nick Mariana, general manager of the minor-league baseball team in Great Falls, Montana. It shows two bright objects crossing the sky and is one of the earliest films of what came to be called UFOs. Air Force and independent studies over two decades reached conflicting conclusions.[1][2]

The sighting

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

At about 11:30 a.m. Mariana and his 19-year-old secretary, Virginia Raunig, were at the empty Legion Stadium when he saw two bright, silvery objects moving over the city. He fetched his camera from his car and filmed them for about 16 seconds.[1] The local Great Falls Evening Leader reported the story the same day, joking that the objects might be home-run baseballs.[3] At one point in the film the objects pass behind a water tower, which later gave analysts a fixed reference point.[2]

Air Force investigations

The 445th Airlift Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio received its first C-17 Globemaster III Jan. 21,2010. The aircraft is on loan from…
The 445th Airlift Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio received its first C-17 Globemaster III Jan. 21,2010. The aircraft is on loan from… Photo: United States Air Force · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

An Air Force officer took the film to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, where Project Grudge quickly decided the objects were sun reflections from two F-94 jets known to be in the area.[1][2] When the film came back, Mariana said that about 35 frames from the start, which he claimed showed the objects most clearly as spinning discs, were missing. The Air Force said it had removed only one damaged frame.[1]

In 1952 Edward Ruppelt, head of Project Blue Book, reopened the case. The photo lab found the objects too fast to be birds, too slow to be meteors and moving against the wind, so they were not balloons. Mariana and Raunig had said they saw the two jets in another part of the sky shortly after the objects vanished, and the analysts did not find the jet explanation convincing; Ruppelt recorded the film as unknown.[1][2] In January 1953, however, the CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel concluded that the objects were reflections from aircraft known to be in the area.[1]

Later studies

Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Robert M. L. Baker Jr., an engineer at Douglas Aircraft, analysed the film for a 1956 documentary and found the jet explanation "quite strained". In 1968 he told a congressional hearing that neither birds nor aircraft reflections seemed to fit.[1] For the University of Colorado's Condon Committee, astronomer William Hartmann concluded that aircraft remained the main working hypothesis but that this strained credibility and could not be fully confirmed. The committee's two investigators disagreed: psychologist David Saunders was impressed by the film, while physicist Roy Craig remained sceptical of Mariana's account of missing frames.[1]

Legacy

Illustration of a disc-shaped craft in the night sky
Illustration: a disc-shaped craft in the night sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Copies of the film are held in the US National Archives.[1][3] In 2008 the Great Falls baseball team was renamed the Great Falls Voyagers in honour of the sighting.[1]

References

This page was last edited on 31 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites