Dewey Fournet's motion study and Navy inquiry

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 9
Dewey Fournet's motion study and Navy inquiry
Edward Ruppelt: Edward J. Ruppelt (left) in 1953
Edward Ruppelt: Edward J. Ruppelt (left) in 1953 Photo: Unknown · PD · via Wikimedia Commons
Date1951
TopicsGovernment programs (topic), Congress & law (topic), Ocean & underwater (topic)
PeopleDewey Fournet, Edward Ruppelt, Donald Keyhoe, Michael Swords
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 42
Year1951 in UFO history
Timeline1951 on the UAP Timeline
Sources8

Dewey Fournet was a U.S. Air Force major who, in 1951–1952, handled UFO matters in the Directorate of Intelligence at the Pentagon and served as liaison to Project Blue Book. In late 1952 he prepared a top-secret study of UFO motions arguing that some showed intelligent control, which he presented to the CIA's Robertson Panel in January 1953.[1][2]

At the Pentagon

Scott Bray (deputy director of naval intelligence) and Ronald Moultrie (Defense Department’s under secretary for intelligence) testify to House…
Scott Bray (deputy director of naval intelligence) and Ronald Moultrie (Defense Department’s under secretary for intelligence) testify to House… Photo: U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Fournet was a pilot and engineer. After General John Samford and General William Garland arrived at Air Force intelligence in 1951–1952, Fournet took over the UFO analysis desk previously held by Major Aaron Boggs. Blue Book chief Edward Ruppelt called him "our liaison officer in the Pentagon", said his word carried considerable weight, and described him as one of the officers most convinced that UFOs could be extraterrestrial craft.[1][3]

The motion study

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In the autumn of 1952 Fournet studied whether the reported movements of UFOs were random or ordered, looking at manoeuvres and formation flying, and wrote it up around December 1952, shortly before leaving the service. He concluded that the formation flying showed intelligent control of a kind people could not achieve, pointing towards the extraterrestrial hypothesis; Ruppelt summarised the conclusion as that UFOs were spaceships. Fournet later said he had prepared it "primarily as a weapon" against apathy and bias in official circles.[1][3]

The Robertson Panel

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Fournet presented his case to the CIA-sponsored Robertson Panel in January 1953, using several of the study's cases. The panel concluded that UFOs posed no direct threat and could largely be explained, and Ruppelt wrote that Fournet's material got the same dismissive treatment as his own and Hynek's. The full study has never been found, but historian Michael Swords partly reconstructed it from diagrams, titled "UFO Formations", attached to a CIA letter of 27 January 1953 to physicist Julius Stratton.[1][2][4]

Later role

UFO conspiracy proponent Donald Keyhoe (right) interviewed by Mike Wallace
UFO conspiracy proponent Donald Keyhoe (right) interviewed by Mike Wallace Photo: CBS, "The Mike Wallace Interview" 1958 March 8 · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

After leaving active duty, Fournet served on the board of the civilian group NICAP. Ruppelt called him the unidentified source of much of Donald Keyhoe's information, and Fournet and Air Force press officer Al Chop cleared several cases for Keyhoe's books.[1][5]

The Navy inquiry claim

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

A claim that Fournet ran a private, Navy-assisted inquiry into undersea and aerial UAP, sometimes linked to the name "Operation Interloper", comes mainly from later accounts rather than released Air Force or Navy records. Swords, who reconstructed much of Fournet's work, describes the motion study as his own initiative and does not document a separate Navy project.[1]

People and topics

Illustration of an open book about flying saucers
Illustration: an open book about flying saucers. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • Project Blue Book — The Air Force's public UFO investigation from 1952 until its closure in December 1969.
  • Unidentified anomalous phenomena — The U.S. government's current term for unidentified objects in the air, in space and underwater.
  • Dewey Fournet — Pentagon Air Force intelligence liaison to Project Blue Book who produced a 1952 study of UFO motions.
  • Unidentified flying object — An object in the sky that can't be identified; the older term for UAP.
  • U.S. Air Force — The U.S. military service that ran the official UFO projects from 1947 to 1969.
  • Edward Ruppelt — Head of Project Blue Book in 1952–53 and author of The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects.
  • Central Intelligence Agency — The U.S. foreign intelligence agency, which has followed UFO reports since the 1940s.
  • Robertson Panel — Robertson Panel
  • NICAP — The leading U.S. civilian UFO group of the 1950s and 1960s.
  • Donald Keyhoe — Retired Marine officer, author and director of NICAP who campaigned against UFO secrecy.
  • U.S. Navy — The U.S. naval service, whose pilots reported the UAP encounters revealed in 2017.
  • Michael Swords — Historian of the Air Force UFO projects.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a screen showing a flying saucer
Illustration: a screen showing a flying saucer. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1951 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites