D'Amato and untraceable black budgets

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
D'Amato and untraceable black budgets
Steven Greer: Dr. Steven M. Greer (Disclosure Project / CSETI / SEAS Power) @ the Conscious Life Expo
Steven Greer: Dr. Steven M. Greer (Disclosure Project / CSETI / SEAS Power) @ the Conscious Life Expo Photo: Energy Artist · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
Date1994
TopicsGovernment programs (topic), Congress & law (topic)
PeopleC. Richard D'Amato, Steven Greer
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 118
Year1994 in UFO history
Timeline1994 on the UAP Timeline
Sources6

Steven Greer wrote in the Disclosure Project's 2001 briefing document that in 1994 C. Richard D'Amato, then senior counsel to the Senate Appropriations Committee under Chairman Robert Byrd, told him that between $40 billion and $80 billion was going into projects Congress could not penetrate, even with a top-secret clearance and a Senate subpoena.[1]

Greer's account

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

According to Greer, D'Amato said he was sure money was going into UFO-related projects but that they could not be penetrated, and told Greer he was dealing with "the Varsity Team of all black projects". Greer included the anecdote in his commentary on testimony from Denise McKenzie, a former employee of the contractor SAIC who described contract files that showed no sign of activity.[1]

Context

Scott Bray (deputy director of naval intelligence) and Ronald Moultrie (Defense Department’s under secretary for intelligence) testify to House…
Scott Bray (deputy director of naval intelligence) and Ronald Moultrie (Defense Department’s under secretary for intelligence) testify to House… Photo: U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

The U.S. classified budget is genuinely large, but most of it pays for satellites, aircraft and intelligence operations. By comparison, the only documented Pentagon UFO-related funding of the 2000s, the program run through the Defense Intelligence Agency from 2007, was budgeted about $22 million over five years.[4]

D'Amato's own statement

Jacques Vallée 2024
Jacques Vallée 2024 Photo: Cmichel67 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

D'Amato's later public statement says that a senior Senate chairman asked him to make a preliminary inquiry into alleged 1940s crashes in New Mexico, and that he concluded they did not merit a Senate investigation. Vallée's journals, however, record D'Amato privately saying in 1990–91 that a secret project spreading false information was acting illegally.[2][3]

Assessment

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The $40–80 billion figure rests on Greer's recollection of a private conversation.[1]

People and topics

Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • C. Richard D'Amato — Senate Appropriations Committee counsel who looked into black budgets for Sen. Robert Byrd.
  • Steven Greer — Physician who founded CSETI and the Disclosure Project.
  • Disclosure Project — Steven Greer's campaign for UFO disclosure, best known for its May 2001 press conference.
  • Unidentified flying object — An object in the sky that can't be identified; the older term for UAP.
  • AAWSAP — The Defense Intelligence Agency's UAP research program of 2008–2010, carried out by Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies.

On the Timeline

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1994 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites