Boscombe Down incident

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
Boscombe Down incident
Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
Date26 September 1994
TopicsCrashes & retrievals (topic)
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 121
Year1994 in UFO history
Timeline1994 on the UAP Timeline
Sources2

The Boscombe Down incident was a reported accident to an unidentified aircraft at RAF Boscombe Down, the UK's main military aircraft test site in Wiltshire, on the evening of 26 September 1994. Aviation enthusiasts said a strange jet was damaged on the runway and later flown out by a U.S. transport plane; the British and U.S. governments denied that any such incident took place.[1][2]

The event

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

According to witnesses, an aircraft aborted its take-off on Runway 23 after a malfunction, possibly a nose-wheel collapse, and was quickly covered with a frame and tarpaulins, surrounded by emergency vehicles and taken to a hangar, where it stayed for about two days. Special forces were reportedly present, and an Agusta A109 helicopter and a Chinook arrived.[1]

Glimpses and the C-5

Illustration of a disc-shaped craft in the night sky
Illustration: a disc-shaped craft in the night sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

On 28 September, when another aircraft was moved from the same hangar, witnesses briefly saw the mystery jet, describing a charcoal-grey, fighter-sized aircraft with inward-canted twin tails, chines along the nose and a forward-hinged canopy — features resembling stealth designs. A U.S. Air Force C-5 Galaxy, reportedly diverted from Ramstein in Germany, arrived the same day and left carrying a tarpaulin-covered object, reportedly for Air Force Plant 42 in Palmdale, California.[1]

Investigation

Illustration of an open book about flying saucers
Illustration: an open book about flying saucers. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The British magazine Air Forces Monthly published a cover story in March 1997 by Ren Hoek and Marco van der Welk after a two-year investigation, arguing that the aircraft was an unconfirmed stealth reconnaissance aircraft they called ASTRA. Other theories have included the rumoured "Aurora" spy plane, a TR-3A stealth reconnaissance craft, a special-operations transport, a foreign aircraft under evaluation or a joint U.S.–UK project.[1]

Official response

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In December 1994 Defence Minister Nicholas Soames told Parliament that there had been no crash at Boscombe Down and that the only flying that night was by two Royal Navy Sea King helicopters on an exercise. Freedom of Information requests by The War Zone produced no records, and the U.S. Air Force Safety Center said it had no information. The incident remains one of military aviation's lasting mysteries, though most observers believe it involved a classified aircraft rather than anything unearthly.[1][2]

In the testimony

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The testimony cites: Majic Eyes Only, p213.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a photograph of an unknown object
Illustration: a photograph of an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1994 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites