Army manual and high-technology devices (1996)
From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event
Contents 3
| Date | 1996 |
|---|---|
| Topics | Nuclear & missile sites (topic) |
| Testimony | Shellenberger testimony, p. 124 |
| Year | 1996 in UFO history |
| Timeline | 1996 on the UAP Timeline |
| Sources | 1 |
Army manual and high-technology devices (1996) — An Army manual lists a unit that responds to incidents involving 'high technology devices'.
According to the testimony, a 1996 Army field manual lists a unit that responds to incidents involving "high technology devices". Researchers have linked this to Army explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) doctrine, which assigns specialized teams to deal with unusual or dangerous items, including space debris and foreign technology.
Military manuals routinely describe how to handle recovered foreign hardware, such as crashed satellites, rocket parts and enemy weapons, and EOD units are often the first responders. Some UFO researchers read references to unusual or high-technology devices as possible cover for UFO recovery roles.
We couldn't confirm the exact wording or context of the 1996 manual from the source cited, which is a social media post. Without the full text, it's not clear whether it refers to anything beyond conventional recovered technology.
People and topics
- Unidentified flying object — An object in the sky that can't be identified; the older term for UAP.
On the Timeline
- Henry Diamond letter to John Gibbons (1995) (1 November 1995) — A letter to the White House science adviser discusses Laurance Rockefeller's UAP efforts.
- Bigelow recruits consciousness experts (1996) (7 January 1996) — Bigelow tells Vallée he is hiring experts on consciousness.
See every 1996 event on the UAP Timeline →
References
- twitter.com · twitter.com · archived copy
This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.
No discussion yet.