Ning Li superconductor gravity test

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
Ning Li superconductor gravity test
Illustration of Earth, the Moon and space
Illustration: Earth, the Moon and space. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
Date1 August 1997
TopicsPropulsion & physics (topic)
PeopleEugene Podkletnov, Ning Li
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 129
Year1997 in UFO history
Timeline1997 on the UAP Timeline
Sources11

In the mid-1990s physicist Ning Li of the University of Alabama in Huntsville, working with NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, developed a theory that a superconductor spinning in a strong magnetic field might disturb the gravitational force nearby, and NASA scientists tested claims of "gravity shielding" by superconductors. No effect was found.[1][2]

Podkletnov's claim

Illustration of a disc-shaped craft in the night sky
Illustration: a disc-shaped craft in the night sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In a paper in Physica C in December 1992, Russian scientist Eugene Podkletnov and a colleague at Tampere University of Technology in Finland reported a small weight reduction above a superconducting disc. In 1996 he submitted a paper claiming a reduction of about 2 per cent above a rotating disc; after a newspaper story about it broke that September he withdrew it, his co-author disavowed it, and he left the university. A version appeared online in 1997.[1]

Ning Li's theory

Illustration of an open book about flying saucers
Illustration: an open book about flying saucers. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Li's theory, developed independently of Podkletnov's work, suggested that rotating superconductors might generate measurable gravitational effects, which seemed to offer an explanation for his claims. Li's group at Huntsville published work in Physica C in 1997 on a static test for a gravitational force coupled to superconductors.[2][3]

NASA's tests

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

A NASA Marshall team led by Ron Koczor and David Noever attempted to replicate the effect. The first test detected no gravitational signal above noise at the level of tens of nanogees with a disc four to five inches across, and another analysis reported no shielding greater than two parts in a hundred million. NASA paid an Ohio company, Superconductive Components, to build a 12-inch disc for further tests, which also failed to confirm Podkletnov's results.[2][3]

Aftermath

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Li later left to start her own company, and the research faded from public view. Mainstream physics does not accept any of these claimed gravity effects. The testimony also mentions physicist Robert Baker's later work on high-frequency gravitational waves.[1][2]

People and topics

Illustration of Earth, the Moon and space
Illustration: Earth, the Moon and space. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • NASA — The U.S. civilian space agency, created in 1958.
  • Eugene Podkletnov — Russian engineer who claimed spinning superconductors reduce gravity.
  • Ning Li — Physicist who tested superconductor gravity claims at NASA Marshall.

On the Timeline

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1997 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites