XViS claim
From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event
Contents 4

| Date | 2 May 2018 |
|---|---|
| Topics | Beings & bodies (topic), Secrecy & cover-up (topic), Government programs (topic) |
| Testimony | Shellenberger testimony, p. 190 |
| Year | 2018 in UFO history |
| Timeline | 2018 on the UAP Timeline |
| Sources | 3 |
XViS claim — An anonymous website claims a system called 'XViS' is used for UAP tracking.
In May 2018, the anonymous "Forgotten Languages" website published an article claiming that a system called "XViS" was used for tracking UAP, linking it to "atypical conscious states". The site often mixes real technical terms with invented material.
There's a real project with a similar name: XVis is a visualization software project at Sandia National Laboratories, developed for analysing massive scientific simulation data on supercomputers. Nothing in its public description relates to UAP.
The site's claim appears to borrow the name of a real project. There's no evidence of a UAP-tracking system by that name.
People and topics

- Unidentified anomalous phenomena — The U.S. government's current term for unidentified objects in the air, in space and underwater.
- Sandia National Laboratories — A U.S. nuclear weapons laboratory in Albuquerque.
On the Timeline
- Bernard Haisch on legacy programs (2018) — Lockheed astrophysicist Bernard Haisch comments on alleged 'legacy' UAP programs.
- Area 29 and Omega operations claim (30 May 2018) — A remote viewer claims targets were linked to 'Omega' operations involving advanced propulsion.
See every 2018 event on the UAP Timeline →
References
- forgottenlanguages-full.forgottenlanguages.org · forgottenlanguages-full.forgottenlanguages.org · archived copy
- xvis.org · xvis.org · archived copy
- sandia.gov · sandia.gov · archived copy
Further reading
- Sandia National Laboratories — Wikipedia · en.wikipedia.org · archived copy
This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.
No discussion yet.