Elizondo on rogue programs (2021)

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 7
Elizondo on rogue programs (2021)
Luis Elizondo in San Marino, interviewed by Max Moszkowicz.
Luis Elizondo in San Marino, interviewed by Max Moszkowicz. Photo: Author: Max Moszkowicz Video title: Lue Elizondo - Max Moszkowicz San Marino interview… · CC BY 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
Date2 September 2021
TopicsBeings & bodies (topic), Government programs (topic)
PeopleLuis Elizondo, David Grusch
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 201
Year2021 in UFO history
Timeline2021 on the UAP Timeline
Sources5

In an episode of That UFO Podcast released in September 2021, Luis Elizondo said that any UFO programs other than AATIP, "if they existed", had probably been run rogue, without oversight.[1]

Special access programs

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, director of All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office at the Department of Defense, gives a presentation during a public meeting of…
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, director of All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office at the Department of Defense, gives a presentation during a public meeting of… Photo: NASA/Joel Kowsky · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Asked about his work in the Pentagon's special access program world, Elizondo said the SAP Central Office sat under the Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, that he had managed SAPs himself, and that because of his need to know he had access to master lists. He said that when he brought AATIP information to several meetings and asked whether anyone knew what was going on, the answer was a "big goose egg".[1]

"Rogue"

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Elizondo said that if other UFO programs existed, they were being run out of sight, keeping the people responsible for oversight deliberately out of the loop, which he called a legal issue for which people could go to jail. He contrasted this with his own work, which he said was known to and approved by people in his chain of command up to the Secretary of Defense level.[1]

Clapper

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In the same answer Elizondo said that James Clapper, then Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence and later Director of National Intelligence, had told him in front of Elizondo's wife that he was glad AATIP existed and that it was something they should have done.[1]

Later claims

Cover of Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs
Cover of Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs Photo: Luis Elizondo/ w:HarperCollins / w:United States Department of Defense · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

David Grusch made a related argument to Congress in 2023, saying UFO crash-retrieval programs had been concealed from proper oversight. The Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office said in 2024 that it found no evidence of such programs.[1][2]

People and topics

Illustration of wreckage at a crash site
Illustration: wreckage at a crash site. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • Luis Elizondo — Former Army counterintelligence officer who says he ran AATIP.
  • Unidentified anomalous phenomena — The U.S. government's current term for unidentified objects in the air, in space and underwater.
  • David Grusch — Former intelligence officer who testified in 2023 that the U.S. has recovered non-human craft.
  • Crash retrieval — The alleged recovery of crashed non-human craft by governments.
  • AARO — The Pentagon office set up in 2022 to investigate UAP.

On the Timeline

U.S. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, September 2002.
U.S. Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, September 2002. Photo: United States Senate · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

See every 2021 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites