1980s CIA programs email inquiry
From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event
Contents 4
| Date | 26 September 2022 |
|---|---|
| Topics | Crashes & retrievals (topic), Secrecy & cover-up (topic), Government programs (topic) |
| Testimony | Shellenberger testimony, p. 209 |
| Year | 2022 in UFO history |
| Timeline | 2022 on the UAP Timeline |
| Sources | 1 |
1980s CIA programs email inquiry — A researcher emails a former CIA science official about 1980s UAP programs.
According to the testimony, in September 2022 a researcher emailed a former CIA science official to ask about UAP-related programs in the 1980s. The exchange was part of efforts to reconstruct the history of the Advanced Theoretical Physics group and related contacts.
The official wasn't named publicly in the material we found, and the reply hasn't been published in full. Researchers in this period were contacting many retired officials to test the claims in the Wilson/Davis notes and earlier accounts.
The item records an inquiry rather than a finding. Its outcome isn't publicly documented.
People and topics
- Central Intelligence Agency — The U.S. foreign intelligence agency, which has followed UFO reports since the 1940s.
- Unidentified anomalous phenomena — The U.S. government's current term for unidentified objects in the air, in space and underwater.
- Advanced Theoretical Physics group — Advanced Theoretical Physics group
- Wilson–Davis notes — Wilson–Davis notes
On the Timeline
- Oke Shannon and Los Alamos UAP interest (24 September 2022) — A former Los Alamos manager says staff studied UAP unofficially.
- ATP meeting notes release (26 September 2022) — The former Los Alamos manager publishes notes from a 1985 advanced physics meeting.
See every 2022 event on the UAP Timeline →
References
- twitter.com · twitter.com · archived copy
Further reading
- UFO documents — CIA Reading Room · cia.gov · archived copy
This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.
No discussion yet.