Aviation Week secret aircraft report (1990)

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
Aviation Week secret aircraft report (1990)
Chuck Yeager next to experimental aircraft Bell X-1 #1 Glamorous Glennis
Chuck Yeager next to experimental aircraft Bell X-1 #1 Glamorous Glennis Photo: U.S. Air Force photo · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
Date1 October 1990
TopicsMilitary encounters (topic), Propulsion & physics (topic)
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 108
Year1990 in UFO history
Timeline1990 on the UAP Timeline
Sources6

On 1 October 1990 Aviation Week & Space Technology, the leading aerospace industry magazine, published a major report on sightings of secret aircraft over the U.S. Southwest, describing dozens of observations of large, quiet triangular craft and vehicles that seemed to hover and then accelerate to supersonic speeds. Its reporting, led by William B. Scott, has been both influential and criticised.[1][2]

The report

NASA's Research Aircraft Fleet on ramp at Dryden Flight Research Center: X-31 , F-15 ACTIVE , SR-71 , F-106 , F-16XL #2, X-38 , Radio Controlled…
NASA's Research Aircraft Fleet on ramp at Dryden Flight Research Center: X-31 , F-15 ACTIVE , SR-71 , F-106 , F-16XL #2, X-38 , Radio Controlled… Photo: NASA/Tony Landis · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

The article, "Secret advanced vehicles demonstrate technologies for future military use", presented the sightings as evidence of classified American aircraft using advanced propulsion and airframe designs, not anything unearthly, and linked them to the "black" budget and to reports of strange sonic booms and contrails. In December 1990 Scott wrote of a possible secret hypersonic bomber.[1][3]

Later stories

The Space Shuttle Endeavour atop its modified Boeing 747 carrier aircraft lifts off from Edwards Air Force Base on the first leg of its ferry flight…
The Space Shuttle Endeavour atop its modified Boeing 747 carrier aircraft lifts off from Edwards Air Force Base on the first leg of its ferry flight… Photo: NASA/Tom Tschida · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Scott went on to report on the "TR-3A Manta" in 1991 and a mothership concept in 1992, and in March 2006 Aviation Week published articles on "Blackstar", a supposed secret two-stage-to-orbit system made up of a large mothership and a small spaceplane.[3][4]

Criticism

P-59A (S/N 44-22609, first production -A model) and P-63 (S/N 42-69417) in flight.
P-59A (S/N 44-22609, first production -A model) and P-63 (S/N 42-69417) in flight. Photo: USAF · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Space historian Dwayne Day argued in 2006 that Scott had a pattern of writing about secret aircraft that never materialised: his stories took a small amount of real information and added speculation, anonymous sightings and unsourced details, rarely naming anyone with direct knowledge. Day noted that the Blackstar concept had circulated in internet lore and model kits before Aviation Week reported it.[3]

Assessment

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Some of the aircraft rumoured at the time were real programs since revealed, such as the TACIT BLUE stealth demonstrator. Others, such as Aurora and Blackstar, have never been confirmed. The coverage is important because it shows serious aviation journalists documenting unexplained aircraft at the same time as UFO researchers.[2][3]

People and topics

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1990 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites