FBI denials of UFO interest

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
FBI denials of UFO interest
Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
Date21 July 1966
TopicsCrashes & retrievals (topic), Secrecy & cover-up (topic)
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 68
Year1966 in UFO history
Timeline1966 on the UAP Timeline
Sources12

For decades the FBI told members of the public who wrote about UFOs that the subject was outside its jurisdiction and that it did not collect UFO reports. Its own files show a more complicated history: the Bureau helped the Army Air Forces investigate sightings in 1947, and its field offices continued to receive and pass on reports for years afterwards.[1][2]

1947

Illustration of a disc-shaped craft in the night sky
Illustration: a disc-shaped craft in the night sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In the summer of 1947, at the request of Army Air Forces Intelligence, the FBI agreed to help investigate reports of flying discs. A Bureau bulletin dated 30 July 1947 told agents to investigate each sighting brought to their attention to establish whether it was genuine, imaginary or a prank, and noted the Air Forces' concern that some reports might be made by subversives trying to cause hysteria. The FBI later withdrew from active investigation and referred reports to the Air Force.[1][3]

The denials

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The testimony cites a reply dated 21 July 1966 as one example of the Bureau telling a correspondent that UFOs were not its concern. A letter from the FBI's Chicago office to researcher Larry W. Bryant on 10 October 1974 is typical: it said the FBI had no information on the sighting he described, that it did "not collect information regarding UFO sightings in general", and that it could investigate only matters Congress had assigned to it, which UFO sightings were not.[2]

What the files show

Illustration of wreckage at a crash site
Illustration: wreckage at a crash site. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The same file shows the Chicago office in September 1967 taking a telephone report of a UFO from an 11-year-old boy and passing it to an Air Force radar squadron. Other records now on the FBI's online Vault include an October 1966 memo from the San Francisco field office to Director J. Edgar Hoover summarising a wave of reports of silent, fast-moving metallic craft, some with small "crew members", from witnesses including police officers, pilots and military personnel. The files also include the 1950 Guy Hottel memo relaying a third-hand story of recovered saucers, which the FBI has said was never investigated and is not evidence of a crash.[2][4][5]

Assessment

Illustration of a humanoid figure under a hovering craft
Illustration: a humanoid figure under a hovering craft. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The difference is partly one of definition: the FBI did not investigate UFOs as crimes, but it received and forwarded information it was given. The testimony uses the contrast as an example of public statements that understated how involved an agency actually was. The files contain no proof of alien visitation.[2][4]

People and topics

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1966 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites