Kingston George
From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 👤 Person
Contents 3
| Type | Person |
|---|---|
| On the Timeline | 2 events, 1964–1984 |
Kingston George was an engineer who worked on the instrumentation and filming of missile tests at Vandenberg Air Force Base in the 1960s, including the Big Sur telescope project.
His explanation
George wrote articles disputing Robert Jacobs's account of the 1964 Big Sur film. He said the film showed normal events in missile tests, such as the release of decoys and radar reflectors, and that the claimed beams were artifacts of the imaging system. He argued that there was no UFO. His view is often cited by skeptics, while Jacobs's supporters say the two men may be describing different films.
On the UAP Timeline

- Big Sur UFO film (September 1964) — An officer says he studied film of a UAP downing a test warhead over the Pacific; the CIA took it.
- John Mills and the Vandenberg warhead films (1984/1985) — An Air Force technician says he saw film of UAP interacting with test warheads.
References
- Big Sur UFO — Wikipedia · en.wikipedia.org · archived copy
- Big Sur, California — NICAP · nicap.org · archived copy
- Big Sur UFO film: whistleblower says he watched it — Robert Hastings · ufohastings.com · archived copy
- Kingston George's rebuttal — Skeptical Inquirer (PDF) · cdn.centerforinquiry.org · archived copy
- UFOs visited nuclear weapons sites, former Air Force officers say — History News Network · historynewsnetwork.org · archived copy
- 579th Strategic Missile Squadron Atlas F sites, Walker AFB · atlasmissilesilo.com · archived copy
- UFOs are stalking and intercepting dummy nuclear warheads during test flights — Robert Hastings · ufohastings.com · archived copy
- Explained: Vandenberg 'UFO shooting down ICBM' video — Metabunk · metabunk.org · archived copy
This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.
No discussion yet.