Movement and Maneuver in Deep Space

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 7
Movement and Maneuver in Deep Space
Illustration of Earth, the Moon and space
Illustration: Earth, the Moon and space. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
DateApril 2017
TopicsPropulsion & physics (topic)
PeopleMartin Tajmar
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 187
Year2017 in UFO history
Timeline2017 on the UAP Timeline
Sources4

Movement and Maneuver in Deep Space: A Framework to Leverage Advanced Propulsion is Wright Flyer Paper No. 67, published by Air University Press in May 2019. Its authors are three U.S. Air Force majors, Brian E. Hans, Christopher D. Jefferson and Joshua M. Wehrle, writing for Air University's Space Horizons research group. The testimony dates the work to 2017.[1][2]

The paper

RF resonant cavity thruster built by NASA Eagleworks laboratory during their 2013–2014 experiments.
RF resonant cavity thruster built by NASA Eagleworks laboratory during their 2013–2014 experiments. Photo: David A. Brady, Harold G. White, Paul March, James T. Lawrence, and Frank J. Davies… · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

The 64-page paper sets out capability requirements, possible solutions and a strategic rationale for gaining an advantage in movement and manoeuvre in deep space, arguing that such capabilities would bring wide benefits to national security. According to the testimony, it discusses how emerging propulsion concepts — including speculative ones such as the Mach-effect thruster and the EmDrive — might change military operations in space if they proved to work, while noting that some remained controversial and unproven.[1][2]

Speculative propulsion

Entrance plaza of the Lockheed Skunk Works, Palmdale, California
Entrance plaza of the Lockheed Skunk Works, Palmdale, California Photo: Alan Radecki · CC BY 2.5 · via Wikimedia Commons

The Mach-effect thruster, proposed by physicist James Woodward, uses piezoelectric stacks to produce claimed transient mass fluctuations; the testimony points out that related piezoelectric experiments, some involving a Lockheed engineer, had been done at the unclassified level about twenty years earlier. The EmDrive, a closed microwave cavity claimed to produce thrust without propellant, was tested by Martin Tajmar's group at the Technical University of Dresden, which concluded in 2021 that apparent thrust readings were caused by experimental errors.[3]

Significance

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The paper is a doctrine study, not a report of working technology. UFO researchers cite it as evidence that the Air Force was taking speculative propulsion seriously at the time the UAP subject returned to public attention.[1][3]

People and topics

Main entrance to Lockheed Martin Center for Leadership Excellence (CLE) in Bethesda .
Main entrance to Lockheed Martin Center for Leadership Excellence (CLE) in Bethesda . Photo: Coolcaesar at en.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
  • U.S. Air Force — The U.S. military service that ran the official UFO projects from 1947 to 1969.
  • Mach effect — James Woodward's proposed propellant-free thrust effect.
  • Mach effect experiments — Mach effect experiments
  • Lockheed Martin — The aerospace company whose Skunk Works built the U-2, SR-71 and F-117.
  • Martin Tajmar — Physicist who tested claimed exotic propulsion devices.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 2017 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites