NATO science grants and anti-gravity claim
From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event
Contents 3
| Date | 1958 |
|---|---|
| Topics | Propulsion & physics (topic) |
| Testimony | Shellenberger testimony, p. 60 |
| Year | 1958 in UFO history |
| Timeline | 1958 on the UAP Timeline |
| Sources | 2 |
NATO science grants and anti-gravity claim — NATO begins supporting anti-gravity research through its science grants.
NATO's science programme began in 1958, the year after Sputnik, when member countries decided to pool support for scientific research and training. It funded fellowships, advanced study institutes and research grants, and today continues as the Science for Peace and Security programme, which supports applied research on security topics such as counter-terrorism, cyber defence, energy security and emerging technologies.
The testimony says NATO began supporting anti-gravity research through its science grants. In the late 1950s, NATO did fund some meetings and fellowships in fundamental physics, and gravitational research was attracting money from many sources at the time. However, we found no NATO grant listing or document showing that it funded research aimed at anti-gravity propulsion. That part of the claim remains unverified.
People and topics
- Anti-gravity — The idea of cancelling or controlling gravity for propulsion.
On the Timeline
- Man in Space Soonest (1958) — The Air Force's pre-NASA 'Man-In-Space-Soonest' program funds a Lockheed spacecraft, later cancelled.
- Rudolf Lusar and the Nazi disc claims (1958) — An Air Force intelligence group analyzes a German author's claims about Nazi flying discs.
See every 1958 event on the UAP Timeline →
References
- NATO Science for Peace and Security — Wikipedia · en.wikipedia.com · archived copy
- nato.int · nato.int · archived copy
This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.
No discussion yet.