Mach effect experiments

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
Mach effect experiments
The NASA SR-71A successfully completed its first cold flow flight as part of the NASA/Rocketdyne/Lockheed Martin Linear Aerospike SR-71 Experiment…
The NASA SR-71A successfully completed its first cold flow flight as part of the NASA/Rocketdyne/Lockheed Martin Linear Aerospike SR-71 Experiment… Photo: NASA · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
DateJune 2001
PeopleJames Woodward
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 145
Year2001 in UFO history
Timeline2001 on the UAP Timeline
Sources7

Physicist James F. Woodward (1941–2025) of California State University, Fullerton, proposed in 1990 a hypothesis, based on Mach's principle, that an object accelerated while its internal energy is changing might undergo slight fluctuations in mass that could in principle produce thrust without propellant. He and colleagues spent decades trying to demonstrate the "Mach effect" in the laboratory.[1]

The theory

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Woodward's hypothesis predicts forces he called Mach effects, also known as the Woodward effect. Mainstream physicists note that the underlying model appears to violate conservation of energy and momentum. Woodward and Tom Mahood patented a device based on the idea, and other physicists proposed experiments to test such transient mass fluctuations.[2][3]

Experiments

Entrance plaza of the Lockheed Skunk Works, Palmdale, California
Entrance plaza of the Lockheed Skunk Works, Palmdale, California Photo: Alan Radecki · CC BY 2.5 · via Wikimedia Commons

From the 1990s Woodward and associates reported small thrust signals from devices using stacks of piezoelectric crystals. Tom Mahood wrote a master's thesis on transient Mach effects in 1999, and Lockheed engineer Paul March reported verification efforts in 2006; Woodward presented the work at conferences of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, including in 2001. A 2010 torsion-pendulum study by other researchers failed to corroborate the claims.[1][4]

NASA funding

Illustration of Earth, the Moon and space
Illustration: Earth, the Moon and space. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In 2017 Woodward and physicist Heidi Fearn obtained funding from NASA's Innovative Advanced Concepts program, which they used to develop thrusters and an interstellar probe concept. Woodward described his work in the 2012 book Making Starships and Stargates.[1]

Assessment

Main entrance to Lockheed Martin Center for Leadership Excellence (CLE) in Bethesda .
Main entrance to Lockheed Martin Center for Leadership Excellence (CLE) in Bethesda . Photo: Coolcaesar at en.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

No practical working device has been publicly demonstrated. In 2021 a team at the Dresden University of Technology led by Martin Tajmar concluded that the apparent thrust of a Mach-effect thruster was a vibration artefact. The work continues in a small community of researchers. Woodward died on 9 August 2025.[1][5]

People and topics

SR-71 production at Lockheed Skunk Works.
SR-71 production at Lockheed Skunk Works. Photo: CIA · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
  • James Woodward — Physicist who proposed the Mach effect thruster.
  • Mach effect — James Woodward's proposed propellant-free thrust effect.
  • Lockheed Martin — The aerospace company whose Skunk Works built the U-2, SR-71 and F-117.
  • NASA — The U.S. civilian space agency, created in 1958.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a triangle of lights overhead
Illustration: a triangle of lights overhead. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 2001 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites