Eric Haseltine on UAP-like weapons

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
Eric Haseltine on UAP-like weapons
Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
Date29 November 2021
PeopleEric Haseltine
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 204
Year2021 in UFO history
Timeline2021 on the UAP Timeline
Sources3

Eric Haseltine, a neuroscientist who served as director of science and technology in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and previously as director of research at the National Security Agency, wrote in November 2021 that the United States did not have directed-energy systems able to produce effects like those reported for UAP.[1][2]

The article

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In a Psychology Today post on 29 November 2021, written after the intelligence community's June 2021 UAP report, Haseltine set aside exotic explanations such as faster-than-light travel and considered only extensions of known science. He argued that human bias, including the tendency to assume the objects are piloted aircraft carrying their own propulsion, might hinder understanding.[1]

Possible explanations

Illustration of a beam of light from a craft
Illustration: a beam of light from a craft. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Haseltine suggested that objects of very low mass would need little force to accelerate violently; that lightweight objects could in principle be pushed by lasers or microwaves beamed from a ship or satellite, like a light sail; and that focused laser or microwave energy can create glowing "free-air" plasmas that reflect radar and appear to move as the beam shifts, which could explain the absence of sonic booms. He noted a 2019 estimate by physicists at Albany that moving a fighter-sized object as reported would need more than a hundred times the United States' daily energy output.[1]

U.S. capabilities

Illustration of an open book about flying saucers
Illustration: an open book about flying saucers. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Haseltine wrote that U.S. scientists did not currently have directed-energy systems able to move lightweight objects or form plasmas resembling the reported UAP, though another party might theoretically have developed such technology. He speculated about possible motives, such as testing responses or sensing military vehicles.[1][2]

Significance

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

His comment is notable because some skeptics suggest UAP might be produced by U.S. or foreign directed-energy or holographic technology. Haseltine's view, from a senior former intelligence scientist, was that the United States did not have such capabilities.[1][2]

People and topics

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

On the Timeline

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 2021 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites