Henderson UFO briefing (1958)

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
Henderson UFO briefing (1958)
Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
Date20 June 1958
TopicsCongress & law (topic), Ocean & underwater (topic)
PeopleJohn E. Henderson
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 61
Year1958 in UFO history
Timeline1958 on the UAP Timeline
Sources5

On 20 June 1958 U.S. Air Force officers briefed Representative John E. Henderson of Ohio and several of his colleagues in the Capitol on the Air Force's UFO program. A memorandum for the record noted their agreement that it would be unwise to give the subject undue publicity, especially through formal congressional hearings.[1][2]

Background

Edward Ruppelt: Edward J. Ruppelt (left) in 1953
Edward Ruppelt: Edward J. Ruppelt (left) in 1953 Photo: Unknown · PD · via Wikimedia Commons

Members of Congress were receiving many letters from constituents about UFOs, particularly after the large wave of sightings in November 1957 and the publication of former Project Blue Book chief Edward Ruppelt's book The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects. Henderson had submitted questions they could not answer.[1]

The briefing

Scott Bray (deputy director of naval intelligence) and Ronald Moultrie (Defense Department’s under secretary for intelligence) testify to House…
Scott Bray (deputy director of naval intelligence) and Ronald Moultrie (Defense Department’s under secretary for intelligence) testify to House… Photo: U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

The briefing was given by Major Boland of the Air Force's legislative liaison office and Major Tacker of its information services, with technical help from Mr. Arcier and Major Byrne of Air Force intelligence. They described Project Blue Book as a continuous Air Force project, said 2,764 reports had been received since 1953, discussed radar and photographic evidence and the use of scientific experts, and handed out briefing kits with statistics, charts and case histories. The Air Force's position was that nearly all reports were misidentified aircraft, balloons, astronomical objects and hoaxes, and that the remaining unknowns showed no threat.[1]

Outcome

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

According to the memorandum, dated 23 June 1958, the members expressed confidence in the Air Force's handling of the program and agreed that public hearings would be unwise. It recommended drawing the Air Force's semi-annual UFO report to the attention of Senator Leverett Saltonstall and Henderson to counter what it saw as a campaign pressuring the Air Force.[1]

Context

John McCormack: John W. McCormack (Speaker of the US House)
John McCormack: John W. McCormack (Speaker of the US House) Photo: United States House of Representatives (Washington, DC) · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

The briefing was one of several in 1958, including sessions for the McClellan and McCormack subcommittees, that the Air Force used to head off congressional hearings sought by NICAP. The documents show how the Air Force managed congressional interest in the late 1950s.[2][3]

People and topics

Illustration of an object over the sea
Illustration: an object over the sea. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a disc-shaped craft in the night sky
Illustration: a disc-shaped craft in the night sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1958 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites