The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🎬 Book or film

Contents 5
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Edward Ruppelt: Edward J. Ruppelt (left) in 1953
Edward Ruppelt: Edward J. Ruppelt (left) in 1953 Photo: Unknown · PD · via Wikimedia Commons
TypeBook, film or media
On the Timeline2 events, 1952–1956

The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects is a 1956 book by Edward J. Ruppelt, a former U.S. Air Force captain who headed Project Grudge and Project Blue Book. Published by Doubleday, it gave the public its first inside account of the Air Force's UFO investigations and remains one of the most influential books on the subject.[1][2]

Contents

Kenneth Arnold: 1947 June 26 Chicago Sun article "Supersonic Flying Saucers Sighted by Idaho Pilot". Perhaps first-use of term "flying saucer" in headline from…
Kenneth Arnold: 1947 June 26 Chicago Sun article "Supersonic Flying Saucers Sighted by Idaho Pilot". Perhaps first-use of term "flying saucer" in headline from… Photo: UPI · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Ruppelt described how Blue Book sorted reports, including a file for "crackpot" letters, and contrasted public statements of disinterest with active investigation. The book covers:[1][2] - the 1947 "flying disc" wave, Kenneth Arnold's sighting and the Maury Island incident; - General Nathan Twining's memo of 23 September 1947, which treated the sightings as real and worth investigating; - the 1948–1949 Mantell, Chiles–Whitted and Gorman cases, the green fireballs of New Mexico and Project Twinkle; - Project Sign's "Estimate of the Situation", which Ruppelt said favoured an interplanetary explanation and was rejected by General Hoyt Vandenberg — the first public account of the document, of which no copy has ever surfaced; - Project Grudge from 1949, which Ruppelt said assumed from the start that UFOs could not exist; - the 1951 Lubbock Lights, Frank Scully's crashed-saucer book and the Aztec hoax; - the 1952 Washington, D.C., sightings and the Air Force's handling of the press; - a suggested link between some sightings and increases in atmospheric radiation.

Ruppelt declined to say what UFOs were, leaving both ordinary and extraterrestrial explanations open and predicting an answer within a few years.[1]

1960 edition

Professor George Adamski with telescope at the Temple of Scientific Philosophy, Laguna Beach, California. The Temple of Scientific Philosophy was the…
Professor George Adamski with telescope at the Temple of Scientific Philosophy, Laguna Beach, California. The Temple of Scientific Philosophy was the… Photo: Los Angeles Times · CC BY 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

A second edition in 1960 added three chapters covering later sightings, the civilian group NICAP, and the claims of contactee George Adamski, whom Ruppelt compared to showman P. T. Barnum. In it Ruppelt said he was now "positive" that UFOs did not exist.[1][2]

Reception

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

A 1956 review praised Ruppelt's sober reporting. Historian Curtis Peebles called it the most significant book of its era, arguing that it should have ended talk of an Air Force cover-up but was instead used to support the idea. J. Allen Hynek later called it required reading for serious students of the subject. Ruppelt is often credited with popularising the term "UFO".[1]

On the UAP Timeline

Vandenberg Space Force Base: NASA’s TRACERS Mission Launches to Study Earth’s Magnetic Shield (SVS14876 - 5~orig)
Vandenberg Space Force Base: NASA’s TRACERS Mission Launches to Study Earth’s Magnetic Shield (SVS14876 - 5~orig) Photo: NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio - SpaceX · CC0 · via Wikimedia Commons

References

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites