Committees told more than the public (2022)

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
Committees told more than the public (2022)
Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
Date18 December 2022
TopicsGovernment programs (topic), Congress & law (topic)
PeopleChristopher Sharp, David Grusch
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 213
Year2022 in UFO history
Timeline2022 on the UAP Timeline
Sources4

In December 2022 journalist Christopher Sharp of Liberation Times reported that sources said certain congressional committees, especially the intelligence committees, had been given information about UAP — including whistleblower testimony about secret programmes — that had not been made public. Subsequent events showed that such testimony had been given.[1][2]

Earlier briefings

Scott Bray (deputy director of naval intelligence) and Ronald Moultrie (Defense Department’s under secretary for intelligence) testify to House…
Scott Bray (deputy director of naval intelligence) and Ronald Moultrie (Defense Department’s under secretary for intelligence) testify to House… Photo: U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Congress had been receiving closed UAP briefings for several years. In 2019 the Navy's UAP experts briefed members and committees repeatedly: Sen. Mark Warner received a briefing in June, the Office of Naval Intelligence held a series of Capitol Hill briefings that summer and autumn, and in October 2019 staff of the Senate Armed Services and Intelligence committees were briefed by physicist Eric Davis, who later wrote that he had told them the craft were "off-world".[2]

The 2023 defence bill

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, director of All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office at the Department of Defense, gives a presentation during a public meeting of…
Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, director of All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office at the Department of Defense, gives a presentation during a public meeting of… Photo: NASA/Joel Kowsky · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

On 15 December 2022 the Senate passed the defence authorization bill for fiscal 2023. Its Section 1673 created a secure process for reporting UAP events and related government or contractor activity to the Pentagon's new All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, with protection from reprisal and from non-disclosure agreements.[2]

Confirmation

Congressman Jared Moskowitz's official portrait
Congressman Jared Moskowitz's official portrait Photo: Ike Hayman · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

In June 2023 former intelligence officer David Grusch said publicly that he had given classified information to Congress and the Intelligence Community Inspector General about a crash-retrieval programme, and he testified at a House Oversight hearing on 26 July 2023. In January 2024 the inspector general, Thomas Monheim, gave members of the subcommittee a closed briefing; some lawmakers said they still lacked answers, while Rep. Jared Moskowitz called it the first briefing that showed real progress.[2][3][4]

Assessment

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Sharp's sources were anonymous, but the existence of closed testimony to Congress was later confirmed. What the committees were told has not been made public.[3][4]

People and topics

Illustration of an object over the sea
Illustration: an object over the sea. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

On the Timeline

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 2022 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites