DARPA Advanced Aerospace System Concepts

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 7
DARPA Advanced Aerospace System Concepts
Bigelow Aerospace President Robert Bigelow talks during a press conference shortly after he and NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver toured the…
Bigelow Aerospace President Robert Bigelow talks during a press conference shortly after he and NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver toured the… Photo: Bill Ingalls · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
DateJune 2008
TopicsSecrecy & cover-up (topic), Government programs (topic)
PeopleJohn Greenewald, Luis Elizondo, James Lacatski
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 166
Year2008 in UFO history
Timeline2008 on the UAP Timeline
Sources12

Advanced Aerospace System Concepts is a line item in the budget of DARPA, the Pentagon's advanced research agency, under program element 0603286E, "Advanced Aerospace Systems". In February 2020 researcher John Greenewald of The Black Vault asked whether it could be a home for UFO research.[1]

The budget line

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Greenewald found the program element in DARPA's 2008 fact file, published in June 2008, the same year the Defense Intelligence Agency sought bids for its Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP). The element funded projects worth roughly $100–180 million a year, such as hypersonic and boost-glide weapons. One line, also called project AIR-01, described studies to evaluate emerging aerospace technologies and system concepts for military use, and to analyse emerging aerospace threats and ways to counter them.[1]

The comparison

Luis Elizondo in San Marino, interviewed by Max Moszkowicz.
Luis Elizondo in San Marino, interviewed by Max Moszkowicz. Photo: Author: Max Moszkowicz Video title: Lue Elizondo - Max Moszkowicz San Marino interview… · CC BY 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

Greenewald noted that the wording, and its later development through successive budgets toward novel launch systems, propulsion and materials, resembled the language of AAWSAP, which Luis Elizondo and others have described as a UFO program. DARPA's fiscal 2021 budget estimates, released in February 2020, continued to fund the line with millions of dollars a year.[1][2]

Assessment

Illustration of an open book about flying saucers
Illustration: an open book about flying saucers. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The budget documents describe conventional advanced aerospace research and do not mention UFOs or UAP. Greenewald himself said it was unclear whether there was any connection, and his FOIA requests about the line were still pending when he published.[1]

People and topics

Illustration of Earth, the Moon and space
Illustration: Earth, the Moon and space. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • DARPA — The Pentagon's advanced research agency.
  • John Greenewald — Founder of The Black Vault FOIA archive.
  • The Black Vault — John Greenewald's online archive of government documents.
  • AAWSAP — The Defense Intelligence Agency's UAP research program of 2008–2010, carried out by Bigelow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies.
  • Unidentified anomalous phenomena — The U.S. government's current term for unidentified objects in the air, in space and underwater.
  • AATIP — The Pentagon UAP effort associated with Luis Elizondo, revealed in December 2017.
  • Luis Elizondo — Former Army counterintelligence officer who says he ran AATIP.
  • James Lacatski — DIA official who started AAWSAP and co-wrote Skinwalkers at the Pentagon.

On the Timeline

Illustration of wreckage at a crash site
Illustration: wreckage at a crash site. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 2008 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites