Flickinger autopsy material claim

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 9

Former CIA physician Kit Green has said that a retired senior Air Force general who was also a physician told him in the 1980s that stories of alien incursions and recoveries were true. Researcher Keith Basterfield has suggested the unnamed officer was Brig. Gen. Donald D. Flickinger.[1]

Green's account

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

In a July 2019 interview published by Richard Dolan, Green said the man was a recently retired Air Force general officer and senior physician who acted as liaison on a classified manned spaceflight program. Green said he hired him for a CIA science board in 1982, and that in 1983 or 1984 the man told him the stories were true and promised to get him cleared for the programs, partly because few physicians were cleared. The clearance never came, though the promise was repeated after Green left the CIA for General Motors. Green said the man died in 1997.[1]

Flickinger

Illustration of Earth, the Moon and space
Illustration: Earth, the Moon and space. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Flickinger, a Stanford-trained surgeon, directed human factors planning for putting a man in space and later headed Air Force bioastronautics and life sciences. He left the Air Force in 1961, consulted for NASA and other agencies including the CIA, served as medical adviser to the U-2 program for over a decade, helped select the Mercury 7 astronauts, and died on 23 February 1997.[1]

Basterfield's findings

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Basterfield found Flickinger by searching Air Force biographies for physicians who died in 1997, and judged his career consistent with Green's description. He found no official record of Flickinger joining a CIA science board and no sign that Flickinger had any interest in UFOs.[1]

The autopsy claim

Dr. J. Allen Hynek (left) and Dr. Jacques Vallée (right).
Dr. J. Allen Hynek (left) and Dr. Jacques Vallée (right). Photo: United States Government · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

Some summaries of Vallée's journals add that Green wrote in 2002 that Flickinger had once seen alien autopsy material. That entry has not been published online and cannot be checked here.[1]

Assessment

Illustration of a disc-shaped craft in the night sky
Illustration: a disc-shaped craft in the night sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The identification is Basterfield's inference, and Green has not named his source. No document supports the claim.[1]

People and topics

Illustration of wreckage at a crash site
Illustration: wreckage at a crash site. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • Christopher "Kit" Green — CIA physician and analyst who became a long-time contact of Jacques Vallée and studied UAP-related injuries.
  • U.S. Air Force — The U.S. military service that ran the official UFO projects from 1947 to 1969.
  • Alien autopsy film — A 1995 film of an alleged alien autopsy, admitted in 2006 to have been staged.
  • Jacques Vallée — Computer scientist and astronomer, author of the Forbidden Science journals and a central figure in UFO research.
  • Donald Flickinger — Air Force physician and space medicine pioneer named as a source by Kit Green.
  • Central Intelligence Agency — The U.S. foreign intelligence agency, which has followed UFO reports since the 1940s.
  • Crash retrieval — The alleged recovery of crashed non-human craft by governments.

On the Timeline

Hal Puthoff
Hal Puthoff Photo: CIA · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

See every 2002 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites