UAP Disclosure Act

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 📄 Document

Contents 6
UAP Disclosure Act
Chuck Schumer
Chuck Schumer Photo: U.S. Senate Photographic Studio/Jeff McEvoy · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
TypeDocument
On the Timeline4 events, 1977–2021

The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act of 2023 was a proposal by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Mike Rounds to require the release of U.S. government records about UAP and UFOs, modelled on the 1992 law that created the JFK Assassination Records Collection. Introduced in July 2023 as an amendment to the annual defence bill, it passed the Senate but was heavily cut back in negotiations with the House. A reduced version became law in December 2023.[1][2]

Background

Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The proposal followed whistleblower David Grusch's June 2023 claims of a secret crash-retrieval program and congressional frustration with the Pentagon's answers. Earlier that summer, the Senate Intelligence Committee's annual authorization bill had already included language questioning any "reverse engineering" of recovered UAP.[1][3]

The Senate proposal

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Announced on 14 July 2023, the amendment would have: - directed the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to create a collection of government UAP records, with a presumption of immediate disclosure and all records to be released within 25 years unless the President certified that delay was needed to prevent identifiable harm; - created an independent review board of presidential appointees to decide on releases; - given the federal government "eminent domain" over any recovered "technologies of unknown origin" and "biological evidence of non-human intelligence" held by private companies such as aerospace contractors.[1][2] The text used the phrase "non-human intelligence" repeatedly and noted that UAP records had escaped mandatory declassification review, partly because of exemptions under the Atomic Energy Act. The Senate passed its version of the defence bill, including the amendment, on 27 July 2023.[1]

Outcome

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

House negotiators opposed much of the proposal, and the final National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2024 (Public Law 118-31) dropped the review board and the eminent-domain provision. What remained directs NARA to assemble, preserve and provide public access to a collection of UAP records, with procedures for review and disclosure. Other sections bar spending on UAP-related work unless it is disclosed to the relevant congressional committees.[1][4] In February 2024 NARA issued guidance telling agencies how to identify and transfer UAP records, and it maintains a public page for the collection.[5][6]

Reaction

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Journalists described the enacted version as heavily watered down: The Guardian called it "stripped-down", and Popular Mechanics reported that the government could still keep UFO sightings secret.[1][7] Supporters have since sought to restore the original provisions in later defence bills.

On the UAP Timeline

Bigelow Aerospace President Robert Bigelow talks during a press conference shortly after he and NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver toured the…
Bigelow Aerospace President Robert Bigelow talks during a press conference shortly after he and NASA Deputy Administrator Lori Garver toured the… Photo: Bill Ingalls · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

References

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites