Project Outgrowth

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 7
Project Outgrowth
Edwards Air Force Base
Edwards Air Force Base Photo: U.S. Air Force photo/Senior Airman Julius Delos Reyes · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
DateJune 1972
TopicsGovernment programs (topic), Propulsion & physics (topic)
PeopleFranklin Mead
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 75
Year1972 in UFO history
Timeline1972 on the UAP Timeline
Sources4

Project Outgrowth was an in-house study carried out during 1970 at the U.S. Air Force Rocket Propulsion Laboratory at Edwards Air Force Base in California to forecast major propulsion developments over the following 40 years. Its findings, published in June 1972 as Advanced Propulsion Concepts – Project Outgrowth, included speculative ideas alongside practical ones.[1][2]

The study

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

An ad hoc group of 28 scientists and engineers, led by Donald M. Ross, evaluated conventional chemical rocketry and assessed advanced concepts under headings of thermal, field and photon propulsion. The results, edited by Franklin B. Mead, ran to 274 pages (report AFRPL-TR-72-31).[1][2]

Exotic concepts

Illustration of a military base at night
Illustration: a military base at night. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

Besides nuclear and electric propulsion, the report considered laser propulsion and a category of "unknown sciences", including psychokinesis, tachyon propulsion and natural electric energy, and touched on using gravity or electromagnetic fields for propulsion. It treated such ideas as long-term possibilities rather than known technology, and it does not mention UFOs.[2]

Context

The 445th Airlift Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio received its first C-17 Globemaster III Jan. 21,2010. The aircraft is on loan from…
The 445th Airlift Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio received its first C-17 Globemaster III Jan. 21,2010. The aircraft is on loan from… Photo: United States Air Force · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

The study came as the Air Force's basic research was being curtailed by the Mansfield Amendments, the first passed in 1970, which restricted military funding to research with a direct military function, and as Air Force gravity research at Wright-Patterson was winding down. A later account says the study concluded that some exotic concepts lacked theoretical and technical merit.[3]

Release

Illustration of lights in formation over the landscape
Illustration: lights in formation over the landscape. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The report is available from the Defense Technical Information Center. Researcher John Greenewald of The Black Vault obtained it, together with a 1973 follow-up document from Wright-Patterson Air Force Base that was also forwarded to the CIA, through Freedom of Information requests.[1][2]

People and topics

Illustration of an observer watching the sky
Illustration: an observer watching the sky. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • U.S. Air Force — The U.S. military service that ran the official UFO projects from 1947 to 1969.
  • Edwards Air Force Base — The Air Force flight test center in California.
  • Franklin Mead — Air Force propulsion engineer who edited Project Outgrowth and commissioned advanced propulsion studies.
  • Unidentified flying object — An object in the sky that can't be identified; the older term for UAP.

On the Timeline

Illustration of an open book about flying saucers
Illustration: an open book about flying saucers. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 1972 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites