Noel Longuemare on the Wilson notes

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🗓️ Event

Contents 8
Noel Longuemare on the Wilson notes
Vice Admiral Thomas R. Wilson USN
Vice Admiral Thomas R. Wilson USN Photo: U.S. Navy · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons
Date29 November 2019
TopicsSecrecy & cover-up (topic), Government programs (topic)
PeopleNoel Longuemare, Thomas Wilson, Joseph Ralston
TestimonyShellenberger testimony, p. 195
Year2019 in UFO history
Timeline2019 on the UAP Timeline
Sources5

Noel Longuemare, a senior Pentagon acquisition official in the 1990s, has said he has no knowledge of the events described in the disputed Wilson–Davis notes, which suggest he chaired the group that in 1997 denied Vice Adm. Thomas Wilson access to a secret UFO-related program.[1][2][3]

Longuemare

Defense Intelligence Agency Badge
Defense Intelligence Agency Badge Photo: Rgbrownii · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

Longuemare served as Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology, and Cox reports that he succeeded Paul Kaminski in 1997. Special access programs, the most sensitive classified defence projects, were overseen by a committee of senior Pentagon officials.[1][2]

The notes

Illustration of a government hearing
Illustration: a government hearing. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

The notes, presented as physicist Eric Davis's record of a 2002 conversation with Wilson, say that in June 1997 a senior review group of the Special Access Program Oversight Committee (SAPOC) met Wilson and sided with a contractor that refused to brief him on a program holding recovered craft, and that the group's chairman warned Wilson to drop the matter. Researchers who compiled a timeline of the notes identify that chairman as purportedly Longuemare. The notes surfaced in 2019 and were entered into the record of a House intelligence subcommittee hearing in May 2022.[3]

His response

Philip Klass: The avionics journalist and prominent UFO skeptic, Philip J. Klass, taken in 1977.
Philip Klass: The avionics journalist and prominent UFO skeptic, Philip J. Klass, taken in 1977. Photo: Robert Sheaffer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

Asked by journalist Billy Cox, Longuemare replied by email that he had no knowledge of the Wilson matter. He pointed Cox instead to a high-level senior review group chaired by the Deputy Secretary of Defense that had executive oversight of certain activities, though he was unsure of its exact title; Cox suggested this meant any such decision might have been made by someone else. Longuemare also volunteered praise for the work of the late UFO debunker Philip Klass.[1]

Assessment

General Joseph Ralston , USAF.
General Joseph Ralston , USAF. Photo: Unknown author Unknown author · Public domain · via Wikimedia Commons

His statement, like that of Gen. Joseph Ralston, is often cited by skeptics of the notes, while supporters argue that officials might not recall, or might not be able to discuss, such a matter. Wilson himself has called the notes fiction.[1][2]

People and topics

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
  • Noel Longuemare — Former Pentagon acquisition official who sat on special access program oversight.
  • Wilson–Davis notes — Wilson–Davis notes
  • Thomas Wilson — Former DIA director named in the Wilson–Davis notes.
  • Joseph Ralston — Former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs named in the Wilson–Davis notes.

On the Timeline

Illustration of a jet meeting an unknown object
Illustration: a jet meeting an unknown object. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

See every 2019 event on the UAP Timeline →

References

Further reading

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites