Reverse engineering

From the UAP Encyclopedia, the open encyclopedia of UFO and UAP history · 🏛️ Program or study

Contents 4
Reverse engineering
Illustration of wreckage at a crash site
Illustration: wreckage at a crash site. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.
TypeProgram or study
Also known asreverse-engineering, reverse-engineer, reverse engineer
On the Timeline6 events, 1989–2022

Reverse engineering means taking apart and studying a finished object to work out how it was made and how it works, so that it can be copied or improved. It is an ordinary practice in industry and defence; during the Cold War, for example, the U.S. studied captured Soviet aircraft and the Soviet Union copied the American B-29 bomber.

In UFO claims

Bob Lazar: Groom Lake and Papoose Lake , both in the Nevada Test and Training Range . Groom Lake is also in Area 51 . Note that some of the lines you see beside…
Bob Lazar: Groom Lake and Papoose Lake , both in the Nevada Test and Training Range . Groom Lake is also in Area 51 . Note that some of the lines you see beside… Photo: Doc Searls from Santa Barbara, USA · CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

In UFO research the term refers to alleged secret programs to study and copy technology from recovered non-human craft. Bob Lazar (1989) claimed he worked on such a program, Philip Corso (1997) claimed recovered technology was seeded into industry, and David Grusch (2023) told Congress such programs exist inside defence contractors.

Evidence

Illustration of official papers and files
Illustration: official papers and files. An artist's impression drawn for this site, not a photograph of the event.

No reverse-engineering program for non-human technology has been confirmed. AARO's 2024 historical report said it found no evidence of one.

On the UAP Timeline

George Knapp (8221331696) (cropped)
George Knapp (8221331696) (cropped) Photo: Peabody Awards · CC BY 2.0 · via Wikimedia Commons

References

This page was last edited on 29 October 2026. Articles are written in our own words from the sources listed under References; disputed claims are attributed to the people who made them.

Discuss the article: missing sources, mistakes, or what should be added.

No discussion yet.

BrowseFeedArticlesTimelineOfficial filesMapTonight’s SkyStatsFavorites